this is the part where i would say the iPod Touch would be a good alternative to a Classic. Or hell, even a Nano 6/7th gen.K4sum1 wrote: ↑18 Nov 2023, 09:35 There is no scenario that I can think of where an iPod makes practical sense to be used. It might be fun to mod, or experiment with, but that's all I can think of. I just can't see any basic music player as a good music device today when old Android phones are cheaper and infinitely more capable.
this is the part where i would say the iPod Touch would be a good alternative to a Classic. Or hell, even a Nano 6/7th gen.K4sum1 wrote: ↑18 Nov 2023, 09:35 There is no scenario that I can think of where an iPod makes practical sense to be used. It might be fun to mod, or experiment with, but that's all I can think of. I just can't see any basic music player as a good music device today when old Android phones are cheaper and infinitely more capable.
Already released 125.0.3.]]>Duke wrote: ↑29 Apr 2024, 19:50 BTW, Firefox 125.0.3 was released today: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/125.0.3/releasenotes/
Already released 125.0.3.]]>Duke wrote: ↑29 Apr 2024, 19:50 BTW, Firefox 125.0.3 was released today: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/125.0.3/releasenotes/
So I hope to have the features from version 125, as of today, not a copy of version 115 ESR ]]>https://eclipse.cx/projects/r3dfox.htm wrote: Eclipse r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser
So I hope to have the features from version 125, as of today, not a copy of version 115 ESR ]]>https://eclipse.cx/projects/r3dfox.htm wrote: Eclipse r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser
Yeah, I should probably make it an option, and the above an option too.]]>
Yeah, I should probably make it an option, and the above an option too.]]>
Not a problem for me, I can deal with the config key values. But I'll try to get used to it for now and I'll see if it's a problem or not over time with practice.]]>
Not a problem for me, I can deal with the config key values. But I'll try to get used to it for now and I'll see if it's a problem or not over time with practice.]]>
I must have messed that up, guess I'll correct in next release.]]>
I must have messed that up, guess I'll correct in next release.]]>
OK I misunderstood it, I expected confignew to be your new implementation.
Attachments
OK I misunderstood it, I expected confignew to be your new implementation.
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments