<![CDATA[Eclipse Community]]> http://board.eclipse.cx Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:41:17 +0000 Smartfeed extension for phpBB http://board.eclipse.cx/styles/aero/theme/images/site_logo.png <![CDATA[Eclipse Community]]> http://board.eclipse.cx en-gb Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:41:17 +0000 10 <![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: Garden Life: A cozy simulator (tested on Windows 7) :: Author Mr. Dick]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=992&p=9492#p9492 https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7, But from what I understand, it currently seems difficult to get modern Unreal Engine games to recognize DirectX 12 DLLs. That’s all for now.]]> no_email@example.com (Mr. Dick) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=992&p=9492#p9492 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:20:34 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=992&p=9492#p9492 <![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9559#p9559 You folks actually like C++?]]> no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9559#p9559 Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:17 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9559#p9559 <![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9560#p9560 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uerEG_yigco]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9560#p9560 Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:54:15 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9560#p9560 <![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by K4sum1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9561#p9561
UCyborg wrote: 07 Sep 2026, 00:00 You folks actually like C++?
Rust is worse.]]>
no_email@example.com (K4sum1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9561#p9561 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:23:39 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9561#p9561
<![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9568#p9568 no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9568#p9568 Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:05:32 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9568#p9568 <![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9569#p9569
UCyborg wrote: 10 Sep 2026, 20:05 Meh, maybe if developers focused on user experience for once, we'd have something decent.
Um, I kind of doubt it.
For one, just WHAT does "user experience" really mean?

ie, I'm very much anti-telemetry and Privacy Rights.

BUT... If that is what the "user" really wanted, then things like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok would have **NEVER** succeeded because THIS "user" has never been on ANY OF THEM.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9569#p9569 Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:57:18 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9569#p9569
<![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9581#p9581 no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9581#p9581 Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:03:43 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9581#p9581 <![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by DoNotThrowOldPCsAway]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9498#p9498 no_email@example.com (DoNotThrowOldPCsAway) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9498#p9498 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:23:09 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9498#p9498 <![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9499#p9499 And I've also read, but I have no evidence, that Youtube has a 'preference' for Chromium based browsers. Maybe because of Manifest V3 which can block less things than Manifest V2 that Firefox and uBlock are still using.]]> no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9499#p9499 Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:37:56 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9499#p9499 <![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9500#p9500 I use Official Chrome v144 and Ungoogled Chromium v144.
My uBO is MV2 because I intentionally use an older version of uBO (v 1.52.2).
v 1.54 is when the "differential updates" were implemented and I *do not like* that update approach.
I've never had any issues with using an "old" version.
I don't really remember why I "skipped" v 1.53 and *INTENTIONALLY* remain on 1.52.2.
I'm sure I had a reason at the time, I just can't think of it offhand.
I use several userscripts to improve my YouTube experience (things like axing the RETARDED "chat" infinte scroll sh#t (I assume it still exists, lol).
I kind of no longer really even know what "default" YouTube looks like, I've axed out the crap for so long.
I don't get "suggestions", I block all "shorts", etc.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9500#p9500 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 02:25:09 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9500#p9500
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9503#p9503
The-10-Pen wrote: 21 Aug 2026, 02:25 I use Official Chrome v144 and Ungoogled Chromium v144.
Yes, because they totally removed MV2 since Chrome/Chromium v145. So you can't update if you want to keep MV2.
My Youtube is also ads free but with Firefox, R3dfox, etc and uBlock Origin you don't see the ads but you have to wait for the time they are supposed to be shown. So I guess that's why people think Firefox is slow on Youtube.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9503#p9503 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:14:07 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9503#p9503
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9504#p9504 I still use MV2 extensions in Edge based on Chrome v151.
It's on a computer I don't have access to until tomorrow.

Generally speaking, you can ALWAYS *manually* install MV2 extensions and there are flags/startup switches that prevent even v151 from preventing or disabling those MV2's (similar to how Firefox can allow unsigned xpi's, you only have to know the config setting, where it is, and how to set it).

That Edge is due to become v152 shortly (I only check updates on Sundays, so I can report back on Sunday).
My Edge is fully "portable" (my OS has ZERO "default" and ZERO "embedded" into the OS, I'm very much "anti-default browser" shenanigans).]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9504#p9504 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:25:02 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9504#p9504
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9505#p9505
I can easily *disable* that A.I. crap in newer versions (ie, flags and startup switches), but I don't even want that d@mn "tab" in the GUI, so I'm sticking with v144 for as long as I can.

I can use newer, and know how to disable in newer, but I'll stick to an OS and a browser with ZERO embedded A.I. sh#t for as long as I can. I already know how to remove it from Win11, but that doesn't mean I'm ready to run 11 yet. Same goes for my browser, I know how to disable in newer browsers, but I'll stick with the "without" for now.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9505#p9505 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:48:52 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9505#p9505
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9506#p9506 But my primary point remains, running MV2 even on TODAY'S version is very easy.
SIX of my 14 extensions are still at MV2.
1 of the 14 is a "theme" that does not show on the "extensions" page (just like Firefox themes do not show on add-ons page).

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg

Attachments


1.jpg (29.35 KiB)


2.jpg (234.95 KiB)


3.jpg (662.27 KiB)

]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9506#p9506 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 11:13:31 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9506#p9506
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9507#p9507 no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9507#p9507 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 20:13:08 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9507#p9507 <![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9508#p9508 And, um, there's no such thing as an MV2 "engine".
At least not in the sense of all of my extensions.
An extension is nothing more than javascript code.
You cannot remove the "engine" to render that javascript code without the browser itself being unable to render that javascript.

Which I guess would turn it into a UWP Browser unable to perform "modern" functionality.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9508#p9508 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 21:26:14 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9508#p9508
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9509#p9509
ie, Firefox will disable it because it is not signed or will not even install it because it is not signed.
Unless you-the-user tells Firefox to stop disabling your unsigned extensions, that "there be dragons in here" and you enter at your own risk.
The same can be done in Chrome.

An unsigned Firefox extension FULLY WORKS, all you had to do is disable the mechanism that disables it or prevents you from installing it.

If Firefox has anything like the "Chrome Store", the extension MUST BE *SIGNED* in order to be "hosted" at that "store".
That "signature", be it Chrome or Firefox, COSTS MONEY.
The typical FREE extension author isn't going to give something away that THEY HAD TO PAY FOR.

I've done this both for Firefox and for Chrome - ran UNSIGNED extensions NOT from any official "store".
uBlock has (had?) a competitor that does just this.
It is (was?) called AD NAUSEUM.

edit: confirmed, STILL EXISTS - https://adnauseam.io/
You won't find it "hosted" at the Chrome Web Store or whatever store Firefox officially "endorses".
But geeks and nerds like you and me still know where to find GREAT content "not hosted" at any "Google", "Apple", or "Mozilla" 'store'.

Outside of that, and to play the same card you have played on me at times, PROVIDE SOURCES of just what in Hades you are referring to as an MV2 "engine" being 'removed since Chrome v145'.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9509#p9509 Sat, 22 Aug 2026 21:33:48 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9509#p9509
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9512#p9512
The-10-Pen wrote: 22 Aug 2026, 21:26 there's no such thing as an MV2 "engine".
Yep, wrong word, I should have said MV2 code.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9512#p9512 Sun, 23 Aug 2026 21:09:16 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9512#p9512
<![CDATA[Browsers :: User Scripts :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9490#p9490 My own "ad blocker", sort of.

Some video streaming sites have no way to block the commercials / ad-breaks.
I used to be able to "target" these by their "1 of 4 ads" type of overlays, but most no longer use those.

So I'm now using a userscript that adds a hidden-until-hover "Blackout" button.
Click it and the entire screen goes dark with the exception of a "peek window" and a cancel button.
Variables are used to set the opacity from a translucent overlay to full opaque (I prefer full opaque).
The "peek" window can be set to no overlay at all for the window to the opacity level of the full overlay.
The audio is automatically muted and returns to original state.
ie, if you were already muted, it stays muted. And if you were listening to the audio, it mutes, counts down, then unmutes.
It aslo unmutes (if you were listening when engaged) when the cancel button is manually engaged.

It assumes a 3-minute commercial break.
Breaks it down into six 30-second segments (the first is set at 27 seconds, basically assuming it took the user 3 seconds to manually engage).
The cancel button changes color every 30 seconds and includes a countdown timer.
The times are set by variables, you can set all six to 15 seconds and assume a 90-second overall commercial break if you prefer.
The "peek" window allows you to cancel the overlay if you "see" [via less nuanced peeking] that the commercial break didn't last the full 3 minutes.

1.jpg
3.jpg
5.jpg
7.jpg

Code: Select all

// ==UserScript==
// @name - Add - Video - List - Blackout Overlay Button
// @version 3.9.1
// @match *://pluto.tv/*
// @match *://popcornflix.com/*
// @match *://tubitv.com/*
// @match *://watch.plex.tv/*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==

(function () {
    'use strict';

    /*** CONFIGURATION ***/
    const SEGMENT_TIMES = [27, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30]; // seconds for each of the 6 segments
    const HOLE_RADIUS = 40; // pixels
    const HOLE_FADE = 40; // pixels
    const OVERLAY_OPACITY = 1.0; // 0.0 (transparent) to 1.0 (fully opaque)
    const HOLE_OPACITY = 0.4; // 0.0 (fully transparent hole) to 1.0 (same as overlay)
    const CANCEL_COLORS = [
        '#dc3545',  // red
        '#fd7e14',  // orange
        '#ffc107',  // yellow
        '#28a745',  // green
        '#17a2b8',  // blue
        '#6f42c1'   // purple
    ]; // one color per segment

    /*** Helper: Pad seconds to two digits ***/
    function padSeconds(sec) {
        return sec.toString().padStart(2, '0');
    }

    function init() {
        let hideTimeout, countdownInterval;
        let currentSegmentIndex = 0;
        let segmentRemaining = SEGMENT_TIMES[0];
        let originalMuteStates = new WeakMap(), originalMuteStatusText = '';

        // Hover detection area (moved to top right)
        const hoverArea = document.createElement('div');
        hoverArea.style.cssText = `
            background: transparent;
            height: 37px;
            position: fixed;
                right: 20px;
                top: 20px;
            width: 84px;
            z-index: 2147483647;
        `;

        // Main "Blackout" button (moved to top right)
        const btn = document.createElement('button');
        //btn.textContent = `Show Overlay (${SEGMENT_TIMES.reduce((a,b)=>a+b,0)}s)`;
        btn.textContent = `Blackout`;
        btn.style.cssText = `
            background: #222;
            border: none;
            border-radius: 5px;
            color: #fff;
            cursor: pointer;
            font-size: 14px;
            opacity: 0;
            padding: 10px 15px;
            pointer-events: none;
            position: fixed;
                right: 20px;
                top: 20px;
            z-index: 2147483647;
        `;

        // Overlay with adjustable center hole opacity and faded border
        const overlay = document.createElement('div');
        overlay.style.cssText = `
            background-color: rgba(0,0,0,${OVERLAY_OPACITY});
            display: none;
            height: 100%;
            mask-image: radial-gradient(
                circle ${HOLE_RADIUS + HOLE_FADE}px at 50% 50%,
                rgba(0,0,0,${HOLE_OPACITY}) ${HOLE_RADIUS}px,
                rgba(0,0,0,1) ${HOLE_RADIUS + HOLE_FADE}px);
            mask-position: center;
            mask-repeat: no-repeat;
            pointer-events: auto;
            position: fixed;
                left: 0;
                top: 0;
            width: 100%;
            z-index: 2147483646;
        `;

        // Cancel button inside the hole
        const cancelBtn = document.createElement('button');
        cancelBtn.style.cssText = `
            background: ${CANCEL_COLORS[0]};
            border: none;
            border-radius: 8px;
            color: #fff;
            cursor: pointer;
            display: none;
            font-family: monospace;
            font-size: 12px;
            line-height: 0.8;
            max-width: ${HOLE_RADIUS * 1.5}px;
            padding: 4px;
            position: fixed;
                left: 50%;
                top: 50%;
            text-align: center;
            transform: translate(-50%,-50%);
            white-space: pre-line;
            z-index: 2147483648;
        `;

        function showButton() {
            clearTimeout(hideTimeout);
            btn.style.opacity = '1';
            btn.style.pointerEvents = 'auto';
        }
        function hideButton() {
            hideTimeout = setTimeout(() => {
                btn.style.opacity = '0';
                btn.style.pointerEvents = 'none';
            }, 0);
        }
        function handleAudioOnOverlayStart() {
            let anyUnmuted = false;
            document.querySelectorAll('audio, video').forEach(el => {
                originalMuteStates.set(el, el.muted);
                if (!el.muted) { anyUnmuted = true; el.muted = true; }
            });
            originalMuteStatusText = anyUnmuted ? 'Unmuted' : 'Muted';
        }
        function handleAudioOnOverlayEnd() {
            document.querySelectorAll('audio, video').forEach(el => {
                if (originalMuteStates.has(el)) {
                    el.muted = originalMuteStates.get(el);
                }
            });
        }
        function updateCancelButtonText() {
            cancelBtn.textContent = `${padSeconds(segmentRemaining)}\n\n${currentSegmentIndex + 1} of ${SEGMENT_TIMES.length}\n\n${originalMuteStatusText}`;
        }
        function startOverlay() {
            handleAudioOnOverlayStart();
            currentSegmentIndex = 0;
            segmentRemaining = SEGMENT_TIMES[0];
            cancelBtn.style.background = CANCEL_COLORS[0];
            updateCancelButtonText();
            overlay.style.display = 'block';
            cancelBtn.style.display = 'block';

            countdownInterval = setInterval(() => {
                segmentRemaining--;

                if (segmentRemaining <= 0) {
                    currentSegmentIndex++;
                    if (currentSegmentIndex >= SEGMENT_TIMES.length) {
                        stopOverlay();
                        return;
                    }
                    segmentRemaining = SEGMENT_TIMES[currentSegmentIndex];
                    cancelBtn.style.background = CANCEL_COLORS[currentSegmentIndex % CANCEL_COLORS.length];
                }

                updateCancelButtonText();
            }, 1000);
        }
        function stopOverlay() {
            overlay.style.display = 'none';
            cancelBtn.style.display = 'none';
            clearInterval(countdownInterval);
            handleAudioOnOverlayEnd();
        }

        hoverArea.addEventListener('mouseenter', showButton);
        hoverArea.addEventListener('mouseleave', hideButton);
        btn.addEventListener('mouseenter', showButton);
        btn.addEventListener('mouseleave', hideButton);
        btn.addEventListener('click', startOverlay);
        cancelBtn.addEventListener('click', stopOverlay);

        document.body.appendChild(hoverArea);
        document.body.appendChild(btn);
        document.body.appendChild(overlay);
        document.body.appendChild(cancelBtn);
    }

    if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
        document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', init);
    } else {
        init();
    }
})();

Attachments


1.jpg (22.86 KiB)


3.jpg (3.22 KiB)


5.jpg (3.12 KiB)


7.jpg (3.09 KiB)

]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9490#p9490 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:19:54 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9490#p9490
<![CDATA[Browsers :: User Scripts :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9491#p9491
The-10-Pen wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 11:19 My own "ad blocker", sort of.
Some video streaming sites have no way to block the commercials / ad-breaks.
I used to be able to "target" these by their "1 of 4 ads" type of overlays, but most no longer use those.
So I'm now using a userscript that adds a hidden-until-hover "Blackout" button.
Click it and the entire screen goes dark with the exception of a "peek window" and a cancel button.
Useful, thanks :thumbup:]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9491#p9491 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 12:28:32 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=986&p=9491#p9491
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9493#p9493 https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/115.39.0esr/

Release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/115.39.0/releasenotes/

Security fixes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-75/]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9493#p9493 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:46:29 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9493#p9493
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9494#p9494
This all to say is I'm backing up my profile (being currently used with ESR 140.0.11 Nightly by e3k-etc) and going back to ESR 115 until at least March 2027. Nice to leave e3k-etc and r3dFox in the dust, and go with a more reliable release schedule.]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9494#p9494 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:28:36 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9494#p9494
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9496#p9496
JodyThornton wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 19:28 being currently used with ESR 140.0.11 Nightly
Notice that R3dfox v140.14.0 ESR is out:
https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?p=9495#p9495]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9496#p9496 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:07:45 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9496#p9496
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9497#p9497
Duke wrote: 19 Aug 2026, 14:07
JodyThornton wrote: 18 Aug 2026, 19:28 being currently used with ESR 140.0.11 Nightly
Notice that R3dfox v140.14.0 ESR is out:
https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?p=9495#p9495
All good! But it's a wee bit too late. Everything I need works fine on ESR 115, and if I need to, I could go back.

The only thing with r3dFox was DRM stuff doesn't work, so a lot of streaming video (like CP24 in Toronto, Ontario, cannot be viewed.) But good on Redacted for issuing a new build when e3k-blah won't.]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9497#p9497 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:42:53 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9497#p9497
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9550#p9550 https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/115.40.0esr/

Release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/115.40.0/releasenotes/

Security fixes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-83/]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9550#p9550 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:46:07 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9550#p9550
<![CDATA[Gaming :: Alternative game stores and why you should use them :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=564&p=9534#p9534 How Steam DESTROYS Piracy… By Doing Nothing
How Steam Became The Only Good Monopoly In Existence
Steam Is NOT the "Good Monopoly" We Think It Is]]>
no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=564&p=9534#p9534 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:35:10 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=564&p=9534#p9534
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: Windows 8 support on newer amd chips (AMD 7735hs) :: Author samanthasymposium]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9514#p9514 i have 2 questions would such a chip be supported on windows 8 or 8.1 and would ddr5 work im currently using windows 10 but want to use 8
]]>
no_email@example.com (samanthasymposium) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9514#p9514 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:00:31 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9514#p9514
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: Windows 8 support on newer amd chips (AMD 7735hs) :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9516#p9516 But I leave the internet searches to you, I read at least two dozen and none of them would give a yes for that combo.
And of course all you get from other forums is "Win 8 is not supported" or "Win 8 is the worst OS ever".
We won't give you that answer here, but I cannot hold your hand either, nothing I can find says a yes in black and white.
But I cannot claim to find an outright "no" either.
If I were to "bet money on it", I would claim that Win 8 **DOES** work.
But you'd kind of have to try it and CONFIRM for certain.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9516#p9516 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:30:25 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9516#p9516
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: Windows 8 support on newer amd chips (AMD 7735hs) :: Reply by K4sum1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9517#p9517 It should install, but you will have no GPU driver and it wouldn't really be a good experience to use.]]> no_email@example.com (K4sum1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9517#p9517 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:34:37 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9517#p9517 <![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: Windows 8 support on newer amd chips (AMD 7735hs) :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9519#p9519 I guess my experience on that is that I have ran "unsupported" Win10 (LTSC 2016 and LTSC 2019) on my newest laptop (Ryzen 5).
I did have to go to LTSC 2021 as my bare minimum on that Ryzen 5 due to "preferring" hardware driver availability.
BUT... even the 2016 and 2019 "unsupported" versions of Win10 *DID* run within a "good experience".
Sure, it would only run at 1024x768 on the "attached" laptop monitor and the external HDMI was limited to the same 1024x768.
But that's still a "good experience" for many folks.
I did need to use 2021 in order to achieve 4K.
But even then, I dropped it to *under* 4K for my useage (I didn't need 4k, but I did need higher than 1024x768).]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9519#p9519 Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:53:28 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9519#p9519
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: Windows 8 support on newer amd chips (AMD 7735hs) :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9520#p9520 I have not tried this directly (but have in the past in regards to "upgrading" WinXP drivers [I had limited success, but success nonetheless]).]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9520#p9520 Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:37:38 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=995&p=9520#p9520 <![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: How to get rid of DPI virtualization? :: Reply by 265 993 303]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9579#p9579
One way to potentially resolve this issue is to modify system files to alter the x86 branches leading up to DPI virtualization. But that would require admin permissions and it would be reverted with every system update. I tried to find the relevant x86 branch at one point in Windows 8.1 but failed to do so, so I still mainly use Windows 7 on my main PC.

Another way could be to identify the setting corresponding to 'Disable display scaling on high DPI settings' or 'Application' and then automatically apply it on every *.exe file that runs. This could be done by inserting values for every *.exe file with data "HIGHDPIAWARE" into

Code: Select all

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AppCompatFlags\Layers
registry. But for this to work reliably, it would have to attach to a file index such as Everything in order to detect created *.exe files to ensure that the setting is applied before the program runs.]]>
no_email@example.com (265 993 303) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9579#p9579 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:44:35 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9579#p9579
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: How to get rid of DPI virtualization? :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9580#p9580 no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9580#p9580 Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:00:46 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9580#p9580 <![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: How to get rid of DPI virtualization? :: Reply by ThatRandomToast]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9583#p9583
265 993 303 wrote: 17 Dec 2023, 10:16 This is the ONE fatal flaw that prevents me from using Windows 8.1 and up. I have 3840×2160 display, and I mainly use 288dpi in Windows 7.

In DWM in Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8, there is an option to Use Windows XP style DPI scaling, which sets HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\DWM\UseDpiScaling to 0 and ensures all Win32 apps get native resolution just like in all earlier Win32 versions. When UseDpiScaling is set to 1, DWM applies DPI virtualization above 120dpi in apps that lack dpi aware declaration, resulting in an upscaling from 96dpi, which defeats the purpose of very small pixels. This becomes particularly problematic in Windows 8.1 which not only forces DWM, but also UseDpiScaling registry no longer works, and DPI virtualization for more than 120dpi is seemingly always enforced. Even Windows 95 and Windows NT 3.5 have fully functional DPI scaling with native resolution at all pixel densities, so Win32 had over 25 years of dpi-aware history, so there is no excuse for DPI virtualization. It's really driving me crazy since it seems like this should be just one integer comparison branch in DWM that has to be edited and yet it completely ruins the experience.
Does upscaling break something?]]>
no_email@example.com (ThatRandomToast) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9583#p9583 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 03:10:42 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9583#p9583
<![CDATA[Windows 8.x & Server 2012 :: How to get rid of DPI virtualization? :: Reply by 265 993 303]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9586#p9586
UCyborg wrote: 13 Sep 2026, 14:00 Maybe have a globally defined __COMPAT_LAYER environment variable and have it set to HighDpiAware.
By itself, that global environment variable applies to the current session in Windows 11 x64, but after a reboot it gets ignored. But when I looked into it further, I found this topic: https://www.eightforums.com/threads/global-dpi-scaling-disable-for-win8-1-for-all-files-users.42452/ When I tested it on Windows 11 x64, it actually works for non-system programs, so that solves the issue for the most part, though it doesn't really work for system32 programs though (this is problematic for users trying to replace notepad.exe and mspaint.exe with Windows XP versions, though it can be workarounded by making them batch files or shortcuts instead).

(I guess that's another one to add to the huge pile of essential things to do before Windows 8.1/10/11 becomes somewhat usable)
ThatRandomToast wrote: 14 Sep 2026, 03:10 Does upscaling break something?
It's pretty damn broken when I can't even view my own screenshot properly. (If I press print screen and paste to XP Paint, I expect the screenshot to appear in exact 1× scale, not some virtualized scale) It's also a huge waste of screen real estate if the application draws on a lower resolution canvas than the screen itself. Windows also supported high dpi for about 13 years (Windows NT 3.5 in 1994) before Vista introduced DPI awareness declaration, and TrueType text can easily adapt to high dpi configurations, so plenty of applications support high dpi without declaring dpi awareness, making DPI virtualization especially wasteful for those applications.]]>
no_email@example.com (265 993 303) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9586#p9586 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:04:40 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=602&p=9586#p9586
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: xpinstall.signatures.required parameter enforcement :: Author James69331]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9501#p9501 no_email@example.com (James69331) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9501#p9501 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:53:58 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9501#p9501 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: xpinstall.signatures.required parameter enforcement :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9502#p9502 no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9502#p9502 Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:01:38 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9502#p9502 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: xpinstall.signatures.required parameter enforcement :: Reply by James69331]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9510#p9510 no_email@example.com (James69331) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9510#p9510 Sun, 23 Aug 2026 01:44:05 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9510#p9510 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: xpinstall.signatures.required parameter enforcement :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9513#p9513 no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9513#p9513 Sun, 23 Aug 2026 21:11:38 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=993&p=9513#p9513 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9495#p9495 https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v140.14.0esr]]> no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9495#p9495 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:05:54 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9495#p9495 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9529#p9529 https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/259

I'm quite sure the culprit is general.useragent.override.discord.com because:
You should NOT use F*ckAnubis in the user agent chain,
You should NOT use %OS_SLICE% in the user agent chain because Firefox > v115 is not supposed to run on Windows 7 & 8,
Some sites don't like older versions of browsers, so only the current version and maybe the version before are supported.

So the issue reporter should set this key value to "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:154.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/154.0" without quotes.
I think I already said it but we should not be forced to use these bypass Anubis user agents.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9529#p9529 Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:13:42 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9529#p9529
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9530#p9530
Duke wrote: 27 Aug 2026, 15:13 About this issue report:
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/259

I'm quite sure the culprit is general.useragent.override.discord.com
I won't rule out the user agent as being a piece of the puzzle, however the underlying issue behind not being able to use cam/mic on Discord (and similar services) appears to be a deeper one ;) :

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/257#issuecomment-5441473923

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/259#issuecomment-5441120246

Also, two facts:

a) Discord use CloudFlare as anti-bot protection, NOT Anubis
b) In (old) r3dfox-140.0.4, built with WebRTC enabled, the default discord SSUAO is:

Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0

however the browser has no issue accessing:

https://discord.com/invite/ecx

rf140-discord.png
;)

Attachments


rf140-discord.png (310.92 KiB)

]]>
no_email@example.com (GoodConscience) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9530#p9530 Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:19:45 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9530#p9530
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9531#p9531
GoodConscience wrote: 27 Aug 2026, 17:19 In (old) r3dfox-140.0.4, built with WebRTC enabled, the default discord SSUAO is:
Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
however the browser has no issue accessing:
https://discord.com/invite/ecx
Yes, R3dfox v153.0.3 fails this WebRTC test:
https://browserleaks.com/webrtc

R3dfox153-WebRTC.png


While it works with R3dfox v140.14 ESR.

R3dfox140ESR-WebRTC.png

Also reported here:
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/257#issuecomment-5441473923

Attachments


R3dfox153-WebRTC.png (5.7 KiB)


R3dfox140ESR-WebRTC.png (6.03 KiB)

]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9531#p9531 Sat, 29 Aug 2026 19:06:21 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9531#p9531
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9551#p9551

Anyway, if R3dfox v155 is taking some time to be built maybe we could have meanwhile a R3dfox v140.15 ESR ? ;)]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9551#p9551 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:51:49 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9551#p9551
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Archer]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9552#p9552
the 140.14.0 ESR works perfectly, thank you for the good work!

Unfortunately, things are different with the 150.x versions.

When the menu is turned on and you hover over the bookmarks works, all folders will be marked.

If I start a video conference, the message appears:
"WebRTC is not available in your browser
It looks like your browser does not support WebRTC.
Please enable it or try another browser."

Note:
media.peerconnection.enabled is true

Is there a way to change this?]]>
no_email@example.com (Archer) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9552#p9552 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:07:07 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9552#p9552
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9553#p9553
Archer wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 10:07 things are different with the 150.x versions.

If I start a video conference, the message appears:
"WebRTC is not available in your browser
It looks like your browser does not support WebRTC.
Please enable it or try another browser."

Note:
media.peerconnection.enabled is true

Is there a way to change this?
I'm afraid not at the moment. Read this post and mine after:
https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?p=9530#p9530

For now for WebRTC use R3dfox v140.14 ESR which is better than an older version of R3dfox non ESR.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9553#p9553 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:25:48 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9553#p9553
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9554#p9554 https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/262

The game is working fine for me with R3dfox v153.0.3 and R3dfox v140.14 ESR if I allow WebGL context.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9554#p9554 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 10:29:26 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9554#p9554
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9555#p9555
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 10:25
For now for WebRTC use R3dfox v140.14 ESR which is better than an older version of R3dfox non ESR.
... We're all very well aware ;) that you tend to focus more on security patches rather than overall web compatibility ...

The fx140esr branch will become EoL at the end of the current month (actually on 29 Sep 2026), with the next ESR branch being shifted to v153(esr); many of the "trendy" services requiring WebRTC to function will start to move away from supporting 140esr and will move on to 153esr (again, for "security" reasons 8-) ), so one, in the coming month(s), may have better chances, from a webcompat standpoint, of having their "video call site" work better in r3dfox-v152.0.4-hotfix, currently the last "recent" (on the release-channel) version compiled with WebRTC support; assuming that the r3dfox author doesn't re-enable WebRTC at buildtime in the next v154.0.x build (or later) ;) ; the v152.0.4-2 (non-working) release notes did mention:
Disabled WebRTC because it didn't work anyways and faster to compile without.
but it appears that detail went unnoticed by the majority of users :| ...]]>
no_email@example.com (GoodConscience) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9555#p9555 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:35:30 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9555#p9555
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9556#p9556
GoodConscience wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 13:35 you tend to focus more on security patches rather than overall web compatibility ...

many of the "trendy" services requiring WebRTC to function will start to move away from supporting 140esr and will move on to 153esr
What makes you thinking that WebRTC won't work anymore in v140 ESR ?
Any source about that ?


GoodConscience wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 13:35
Disabled WebRTC because it didn't work anyways and faster to compile without.
but it appears that detail went unnoticed by the majority of users :| ...
Yes, I admit I missed this information.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9556#p9556 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:11:53 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9556#p9556
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9557#p9557
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 16:11
What makes you thinking that WebRTC won't work anymore in v140 ESR ?
... I didn't say that the WebRTC feature itself might quit working in r3dfox-140.14.0esr in the coming weeks (although the feature does get security and performance updates by upstream, i.e. Mozilla), I hinted that the web services/sites (e.g. Discord, Zoom, etc.) requiring it will start blocking fx-140esr-based browsers, due to 140esr no longer being supported by Mozilla, as being insecure, etc. (one might get the error message: Your browser is no longer supported by "us"; update to the latest version of Firefox), at first via a user-agent filter and later by implementing JS+CSS code NOT supported by fx140esr and earlier; this is what they usually do :evil: ...]]>
no_email@example.com (GoodConscience) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9557#p9557 Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:35:34 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9557#p9557
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9563#p9563
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 00:51 if R3dfox v155 is taking some time to be built maybe we could have meanwhile a R3dfox v140.15 ESR ? ;)
BUMP! :wave:]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9563#p9563 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:06:14 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9563#p9563
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9564#p9564 no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9564#p9564 Wed, 09 Sep 2026 13:10:54 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9564#p9564 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9565#p9565
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 00:51 if R3dfox v155 is taking some time to be built maybe we could have meanwhile a R3dfox v140.15 ESR ? ;)
I also wish e3k-blah would have done this, instead of going on his "let's make XP compatible again" distraction. The browser was called "Firefox for Windows 7", so stick to being focused. Instead, I had to listen to a bunch of crap as to why I should be more "grateful" for volunteers making these forks. While they're not "wrong", people build expectations once they find a working solution for modern browsing on Windows 7 and 8. Then to watch it go kaput is irritating.]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9565#p9565 Wed, 09 Sep 2026 13:16:43 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9565#p9565
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9566#p9566
JodyThornton wrote: 09 Sep 2026, 13:10 I wouldn't be able to run DRM video.
It works for me but requires some fiddling. Check this:
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/256#issuecomment-5249092576]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9566#p9566 Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:35:36 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9566#p9566
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by eclstedt]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9567#p9567
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 00:51 ...
Anyway, if R3dfox v155 is taking some time to be built maybe we could have meanwhile a R3dfox v140.15 ESR ? ;)
Same! I'm only interested in ESR releases. I don't want/need the latest features, I just want a browser that works well.]]>
no_email@example.com (eclstedt) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9567#p9567 Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:45:12 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9567#p9567
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by PantelicGR]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9575#p9575 The r3dfox repo on GitHub has been archived for security reasons for 24 hours and it's up again along with the Eclipse Community Forum.

Can you explain what happened?
Should we take some security measures as well?
]]>
no_email@example.com (PantelicGR) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9575#p9575 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:37:13 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9575#p9575
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9576#p9576 ie, r3d in this corner, e3k in that corner. But I could be wrong...]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9576#p9576 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:38:52 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9576#p9576 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9577#p9577
The-10-Pen wrote: 12 Sep 2026, 14:38 ie, r3d in this corner, e3k in that corner. But I could be wrong...
I think e3k has nothing to do with that. But if you look at the team list you may notice that someone has vanished:
https://board.eclipse.cx/memberlist.php?mode=team

And some of his threads and posts as well.
I don't know what happened and I hope K4sum1 will tell us if we should take some security measures like changing our passwords or more (e.g., what about the softwares ?).
One thing: for me the forum is much slower when I'm logged in than when I'm not :think:]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9577#p9577 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:46:08 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9577#p9577
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9578#p9578 Not good, IMO, as he was talking about a MODERN ENGINE browser release.]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9578#p9578 Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:19:23 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9578#p9578 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by cyberdisc]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9582#p9582 no_email@example.com (cyberdisc) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9582#p9582 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 01:08:40 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9582#p9582 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9584#p9584
cyberdisc wrote: 14 Sep 2026, 01:08 does anyone know of any working complete CSS themes for r3dfox especially any old mozilla/netscape inspired ones?
I've found that:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/netscape-navigator/

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/animated-netscape/

https://github.com/simply1233/Firefox-Netscape-7

https://github.com/matthewmx86/RetroThemesFirefox

https://codeberg.org/wvttlv0vjus2r9/Diet-Netscape-Theme

I don't know if they are fully working as I've not tested any of them.]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9584#p9584 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:11:59 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9584#p9584
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9585#p9585
Duke wrote: 06 Sep 2026, 00:51 if R3dfox v155 is taking some time to be built maybe we could have meanwhile a R3dfox v140.15 ESR ? ;)
Don't let us down. Please 🙏]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9585#p9585 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:22:37 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9585#p9585
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Author JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9521#p9521 https://msfn.org/board/topic/187865-older-browser-issues/#comment-1289221]]> no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9521#p9521 Tue, 25 Aug 2026 19:20:56 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9521#p9521 <![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9522#p9522 There are fine lines being crossed and certain members would have been banned if this type of "stirring the pot" occurred.
My moderators would place "silent votes" when shenanigans like this unfolded.
The forum owner has spoken, and the "kid" continues to provoke and poke ribs.
His most recent "table" is also clearly BIASED (h#ll, a VERY large percentage of those "XP Posts" are directly tied to 360Chrome threads).]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9522#p9522 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:16:41 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9522#p9522
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9523#p9523 Roughly 8,600 of the 211,200 "XP Posts" are all 360Chrome posts. That's good for 4.1% :D]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9523#p9523 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:31:00 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9523#p9523 <![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9524#p9524 ]]> no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9524#p9524 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:46:37 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9524#p9524 <![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9525#p9525
It's the same with the recent steps e3k-blah took in reworking Firefox For Windows 7. He went and catered to the "XP should live forever crowd", when we had a perfectly working browser for Windows 7 or 8 already. Everyone says, "Oh Jody! Be patient because e3k-blah is reworking it so it can work with XP too", and I'm like, "hmmmm - I could care less about XP".

So I went back to ESR 115 and didn't look back. Now I can just sit back, grab some popcorn and watch the XP crowd lose their marbles as they lose their "retro computing" home. I'm going to enjoy the fireworks! :D]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9525#p9525 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 01:00:50 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9525#p9525
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9526#p9526 It really is time (past time!) for the XP Crowd to fade off into the sunset.

@xper has done the RIGHT THING !!!
His server was all but "57005" (Hex = DEAD) and his "reputation" was falling into the toilet FAST.
Several members have requested their discussions to be taken to other forums due to nature of MSFN's "connectivity".

It's a BUSINESS DECISION.
And @xper DID THE RIGHT THING !!!

To the point where I have never "contributed" money to a forum owner ever in my lifetime (I want PUBLIC records of where the money goes!) but I just might now that @xper made the right move FOR THE FUTURE of MSFN.

Because of some of the "rep farming" going on over at MSFN (look at THREE of the top members by "rep points").
These are "faked" and all but a *GAME* by TWO members that log in daily to post FAKE "LIKES".
That type of sh#t gets under my skin. It shouldn't, but it does, lol.
So in that sense, I'm all for grabbing that bag of popcorn, sitting back and watching, and seeing if the "kid" gets himself BANNED.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9526#p9526 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 01:18:09 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9526#p9526
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9536#p9536
Only incompetent morons with shit for brains can make a claim that developing in a way to be compatible with Pale Moon makes impossible development conflict, LMAO.

There are still thriving forums out there not imposing Cloudflare / Anubis BS on their users, eg. VOGONS and Ross-Tech.]]>
no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9536#p9536 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:33:35 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9536#p9536
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9538#p9538
However, if this is what ends up killing the vintage XP/Pale Moon tide of popularity, then ... meh, I don't care. I remember getting it up the ass by folks on MSFN because in 2014, when I ditched XP x64 for Vista, and they used to say I was spreading FUD (you don't really hear that one anymore, so it shows even the vintage crowd follows trends).

Now those same folks love Vista just as much. Plus the ACTUAL Pale Moon group don't look fondly on XP either. Besides, the Pale Moon folks don't seem to look fondly on modern web standards either.

To me, Windows 8 is about as old as I go. With Classic Shell, it's a flat, fast OS that can still run productively modern software, that's gets work done in the modern era. XP looks fine with six feet of dirt on top of it, and out of date browsers like New Moon and Pale Moon can be buried in the plot beside it.

I saw Astroskipper fighting back on Xper by saying, "New Moon is not old software". Well actually, it IS vintage software, but just with modern updates.]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9538#p9538 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 20:44:06 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9538#p9538
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9539#p9539 It will ALWAYS be at least TWO YEARS behind Chrome. IF NOT THREE YEARS !!!
In a day and age where two MONTHS is considered a very long time.
New Moon is **DEAD**. Give up on that trash.
Just my opinion, of course.

That aside, MSFN has been **TERRIBLE**.
I'm thankful that they are ***FINALLY*** !!! spending their donations on actual fixes rather than on *BEER* and backyard BBQs.
Sarcastic... KIND OF...
But holy hell... After all of the FAKE ACCOUNTS that I warned them about TWO YEARS AGO, they just won't listen.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9539#p9539 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:08:54 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9539#p9539
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9540#p9540 In some ways, I guess I kind of hope that he does. I probably shouldn't say that out loud, but there it is, lol.
If I were him, that's exactly what I would do, SHUT IT DOWN. But I'd start a new forum under new software with all new members.
AND KEEP IT UP TO DATE THIS TIME. These problems all started because he "took in donations" but clearly did not spend them on the server!
Just my take on it, of course.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9540#p9540 Mon, 31 Aug 2026 11:24:36 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9540#p9540
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9541#p9541
I think you'll find that with all of this MSFN downtime, folks will just gradually scurry away from the site.]]>
no_email@example.com (JodyThornton) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9541#p9541 Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:44:55 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9541#p9541
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9542#p9542
About MSFN, I'm surprised xper didn't shut down the forum before, considering certain individuals over there. And not being into daily driving particularly old hardware/software. Hobby's one thing, but MSFN crowd seems rather peculiar in insisting on Windows XP as a daily driver for the rest of eternity. Plus considering the nature of world of computers where change has been a constant phenomenon.

Nothing against him regarding the direction of Invision Community. Modern web is objectively atrocious - Almost nobody pays attention to web standards anymore - Screen readers suffer as nearly 90% of top websites tested contain HTML spec violations.]]>
no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9542#p9542 Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:10:10 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9542#p9542
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Uh Oh! That Can't Be Good :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9543#p9543
Over a decade ago, our manufacturing equipment was "mandated" to use FIREFOX ONLY for the manufacturing screens that tell the line workers where to shift their focus.

Because at the time, FIREFOX did *NOT* comply to standards and our engineering USED THAT and difficult tables and live-feed data streams would only show that table as a "square" when and ONLY WHEN "standards" were *NOT* adhered to.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9543#p9543 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 15:09:16 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=996&p=9543#p9543
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9544#p9544
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260815-3219d2d-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260815-3219d2d-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260815-3219d2d-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260815-d849524bd-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260815-d849524bd-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260815-d849524bd-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260815-d849524bd-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260815-d849524bd-uxp-e5e0e958e3-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Issue #2473 - implement :has() CSS pseudo class (aed631e589)
- Issue #3157 - Implement support for adoptedStyleSheets (785da0a0c3)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9544#p9544 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:04:21 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9544#p9544
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9545#p9545
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260815-40a79c75-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260815-40a79c75-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260815-id-656ea98-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260815-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-e5e0e958e3-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9545#p9545 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:04:40 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9545#p9545
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9546#p9546 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260815-ff12641a1-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260815-ff12641a1-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- ported from UXP: Issue #2473 - implement :has() CSS pseudo class (aed631e5) (7aed4de76)
- ported from UXP: Issue #3157 - Implement support for adoptedStyleSheets (785da0a0) (ff12641a1)]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9546#p9546 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:04:55 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9546#p9546
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9547#p9547
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260905-3219d2d-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260905-3219d2d-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260905-3219d2d-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260905-d849524bd-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260905-d849524bd-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260905-d849524bd-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260905-d849524bd-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260905-d849524bd-uxp-11ae877de0-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Replace strnlen with memchr. See code comment. (a74a510873)
- [DOM] Keep resized windows within reasonable bounds. (d91415b005)
- [gfx] Hold a strong ref to platform font entry. (3c098a9891)
- [gfx] Add buffer integer limit check to NVImage::GetAsSourceSurface. (60b7352394)
- [gfx] Check format 4 subtable length and Zero newly-allocated range. (1d17f9bf14)
- [gfx] Clean up cairo-win32-printing-surface.c (1d84253588)
- [layout] Prevent recursion of callbacks in PressShell. (d5fd5bf3ca)
- Bug 2057204 - use the right AddSystemEventListener variant with nsFileControlFrame::mMouseListener (86c8267530)
- [image] Simplify and further improve handling of destroying raster images. (bfe7453ddf)
- Resolve various assertions in debug builds (a5e46d4bbd)
- [DOM] Improve MediaInfo/Data a little. (887b1940d4)
- [gfx] Skia: Port grey mode pixelspace fix. (832062fa67)
- [parser] Only check for high surrogates when intending to avoid split pair. (0ae79a0f7e)
- Bug 2058622 - Validate selected options entries. (7b26e2f7cd)
- No issue - remove duplicate HTMLWin32ObjectAccessible from build. (3151562123)
- [DOM] Remove content from parent node before appending. (c9c1f678d3)
- [DOM] Clear mDocumentChildren after XSLT branch consumes it in DidBuildModel. (3687adcaec)
- Bug 2027380 - pass offset-adjusted pointer to SEC_ASN1GetSubtemplate in QuickDER call sites. (e4ca42477f)
- Bug 2029289 - fix off-by-one offset in pk11_buildNickname cert_id branch. (56fc8b29ec)
- Bug 2029750 - Reject undersized IV and key SECItems in PBES2 cipher dispatchers. (5227d5a9a6)
- Bug 2029794 - handle NSSCertificate identity changing in __CERT_AddTempCertToPerm (f86aa85f98)
- Bug 2027388 - add defensive check on pk11_HandUnwrap key size. (d8ef293df7)
- [DOM media] Reset CORS mode as-appropriate. (8980dbb8fc)
- [network] Reject NUL bytes in chunked trailer and chunk-size lines. (14e880ec29)
- [DOM] Hold a strong ref to the composed document in nsFocusManager. (0dd6e1178c)
- [editor] Hold a strong ref. (e3fe86d097)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

My changes picked since my last build:
- Revert "Issue #2473 - implement :has() CSS pseudo class" (906f4cb77a)
- Revert "No issue - remove duplicate HTMLWin32ObjectAccessible from build." (6116fc571f)

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9547#p9547 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:05:06 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9547#p9547
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9548#p9548
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260905-40a79c75-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260905-40a79c75-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260905-id-656ea98-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260905-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-11ae877de0-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9548#p9548 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:05:20 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9548#p9548
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9549#p9549 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260905-69d8d0eeb-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260905-69d8d0eeb-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- Revert "ported from UXP: Issue #2473 - implement :has() CSS pseudo class (aed631e5)" (f37ae9305)
- import from UXP:
- Bug 2027380 - pass offset-adjusted pointer to SEC_ASN1GetSubtemplate in QuickDER call sites. (e4ca42477f)
- Bug 2029289 - fix off-by-one offset in pk11_buildNickname cert_id branch. (56fc8b29ec)
- Bug 2029750 - Reject undersized IV and key SECItems in PBES2 cipher dispatchers. (5227d5a9a6)
- Bug 2029794 - handle NSSCertificate identity changing in __CERT_AddTempCertToPerm (f86aa85f98)
- Bug 2027388 - add defensive check on pk11_HandUnwrap key size. (d8ef293df7) (ca2859464)
- import from UXP: Replace strnlen with memchr. See code comment. (a74a5108) (60dd79100)
- ported from UXP: [DOM] Keep resized windows within reasonable bounds. (d91415b0) (241221671)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Hold a strong ref to platform font entry. (3c098a98) (a97442845)
- ported from UXP: [gfx] Add buffer integer limit check to NVImage::GetAsSourceSurface. (60b73523) (da097637e)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Check format 4 subtable length and Zero newly-allocated range. (1d17f9bf) (2a03a5cdc)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Clean up cairo-win32-printing-surface.c (1d842535) (62bbea2f1)
- ported from UXP: [layout] Prevent recursion of callbacks in PressShell. (d5fd5bf3) (0be2c29bf)
- import from UXP: Bug 2057204 - use the right AddSystemEventListener variant with nsFileControlFrame::mMouseListener (86c82675) (8431cec2d)
- import from UXP: [image] Simplify and further improve handling of destroying raster images. (bfe7453d) (b0b4201ff)
- ported from UXP: Resolve various assertions in debug builds (a5e46d4b) (b1721e606)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Improve MediaInfo/Data a little. (887b1940) (28f2ef572)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Skia: Port grey mode pixelspace fix. (832062fa) (b90fb195b)
- import from UXP: [parser] Only check for high surrogates when intending to avoid split pair. (0ae79a0f) (337ccdc67)
- import from UXP: Bug 2058622 - Validate selected options entries. (7b26e2f7) (0c41b7d2c)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Remove content from parent node before appending. (c9c1f678) (c0e7cbedd)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Clear mDocumentChildren after XSLT branch consumes it in DidBuildModel. (3687adca) (4fde6fed6)
- import from UXP: [DOM media] Reset CORS mode as-appropriate. (8980dbb8) (2174ea5e0)
- import from UXP: [network] Reject NUL bytes in chunked trailer and chunk-size lines. (14e880ec) (8a2f7d830)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Hold a strong ref to the composed document in nsFocusManager. (0dd6e117) (7947eff86)
- import from UXP: [editor] Hold a strong ref. (e3fe86d0) (69d8d0eeb)]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9549#p9549 Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:05:32 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9549#p9549
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9572#p9572
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260912-3219d2d-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260912-3219d2d-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260912-3219d2d-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260912-d849524bd-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260912-d849524bd-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260912-d849524bd-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260912-d849524bd-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260912-d849524bd-uxp-851a213cdf-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Update Likely Subtags for UTS 35 (3198edd25c)
- Update ICU Build Flags (72c3183e34)
- Include Cleanup (69b7925684)
- Remove Georgian Special Casing Skip (fd7b96ce8b)
- Move ICU Data to ReadOnly Section (6f4f936318)
- Add RW fallback for non Gnu-C Compilers or Solaris (9419361b4b)
- Avoid triggering read barrier in DumpHeap and when collecting stats (f5b8f2fb58)
- Implement cycle collection support for the Visual Viewport API (928f7e48f0)
- Make cycle collector aware of Timeout's mTimer. (e293126926)
- Prevent Fetch Request/Response from leaking mSignal (08c901e199)
- Prevent potential leak of IndexedDB mDatabaseActor (b218af53c8)
- Allow incremental GC when keepAtoms is set (5ecc2607bb)
- Assert GCRuntime::enter/leaveUnsafe region is main-thread only (85300bf68c)
- Remove obsoleted NS_INTERFACE_MAP_BEGIN_CYCLE_COLLECTION_INHERITED (e2e0edec51)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9572#p9572 Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:59:03 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9572#p9572
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9573#p9573
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260912-40a79c75-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260912-40a79c75-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260912-id-656ea98-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260912-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-851a213cdf-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9573#p9573 Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:59:13 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9573#p9573
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9574#p9574 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260912-0178b1502-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260912-0178b1502-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- import from UXP: Update Likely Subtags for UTS 35 (3198edd2) (61b199283)
- import from UXP: Update ICU Build Flags (72c3183e) (abe3e82cd)
- import from UXP: Include Cleanup (69b79256) (777aaec39)
- import from UXP: Remove Georgian Special Casing Skip (fd7b96ce) (9ffd770df)
- import from UXP:
- Move ICU Data to ReadOnly Section (6f4f9363)
- Add RW fallback for non Gnu-C Compilers or Solaris (9419361b) (e0c2869d8)
- import from UXP: Avoid triggering read barrier in DumpHeap and when collecting stats (f5b8f2fb) (603f8fd60)
- ported from UXP: Implement cycle collection support for the Visual Viewport API (928f7e48) (41f128b48)
- import from UXP: Make cycle collector aware of Timeout's mTimer. (e2931269) (820087a79)
- import from UXP: Prevent Fetch Request/Response from leaking mSignal (08c901e1) (14bcd1a8c)
- import from UXP: Prevent potential leak of IndexedDB mDatabaseActor (b218af53) (0178b1502)]]>
no_email@example.com (roytam1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9574#p9574 Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:59:22 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9574#p9574
<![CDATA[Mypal Browser :: New Mypal68 :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=658&p=9562#p9562 https://codeberg.org/Theodor2/Mypal68/releases/tag/78.1.0]]> no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=658&p=9562#p9562 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:04:10 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=658&p=9562#p9562 <![CDATA[General Chat :: MSFN :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9511#p9511 FINALLY getting their act together !!!
I really do not give a rats a$$ about the "roytam browser users" (that "brag" about their Android device fallback) STIRRING THE POT !!!
For one, their definition of "fallback" is SERIOUSLY MISGUIDED. I *promise* you that they use that "fallback" WAY MORE than their "non-fallback".
That is simply *NOT* the definition of a "fallback device", it *IS* the definition of a "hobby on the side".

Seriously, really NO DIFFERENT than me running Win10 but then publicly biatching and moaning that ANY given website doesn't work from inside my Win98 (or even Commodore 64!) "hobby on the side". I get it, we have to draw the line somewhere. ie, I'm rebuilding one of my machines with WIN SEVEN. But you will *NEVER* hear me publicly biatch and moan if I cannot access Eclipse (or even MSFN!) from that WIN SEVEN "hobby on the side".

The number of hours spent doing "real work" on the Win10 or Android compared to the number of hours spent on the "hobby" is NOT what defines your fallback. It simply defines your DEDICATION toward your HOBBY.

I SINCERELY HOPE THAT ECLIPSE IS GOING TO GET THEIR ACT TOGETHER ALSO.
And to date, THEY HAVE NOT. Accessing this site continues to be a d@mn NIGHTMARE.]]>
no_email@example.com (The-10-Pen) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9511#p9511 Sun, 23 Aug 2026 11:07:41 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9511#p9511
<![CDATA[General Chat :: MSFN :: Reply by K4sum1]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9518#p9518 no_email@example.com (K4sum1) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9518#p9518 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 22:36:42 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=897&p=9518#p9518 <![CDATA[General Chat :: Introduce yourselves here! :: Reply by space]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9527#p9527 no_email@example.com (space) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9527#p9527 Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:33:53 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9527#p9527 <![CDATA[General Chat :: Introduce yourselves here! :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9528#p9528 Sometimes I feel like I'm in the outer space. Sometimes.
Anyway, welcome to the forums!]]>
no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9528#p9528 Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:01:58 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=18&p=9528#p9528
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Coindrop - new payment revolution ? :: Author luk3Z]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9532#p9532
Reward your community with a single command. Send crypto instantly, withdraw anytime.
https://www.coindrop.cc

Attachments


Capture2.jpg (48.46 KiB)

]]>
no_email@example.com (luk3Z) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9532#p9532 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:54:43 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9532#p9532
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Coindrop - new payment revolution ? :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9533#p9533 ]]> no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9533#p9533 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:07:46 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=997&p=9533#p9533 <![CDATA[General Chat :: Small Break From Eclipse :: Reply by UCyborg]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9535#p9535
I still remember the atrocity fglrx driver was. And open-source one had half the performance it was supposed to have... Then you buy NVIDIA and you just get problems in other areas. Few honest people will tell you both are actually crap.

Heh, this title is certainly fitting: Windows hates me, but Linux Ruined Me – A Power User's Perspective

And font rendering out-of-box...it's PAINFUL! At least to me.

https://saf1.me/blog/linux-font-rendering/

I haven't tried these and I don't even where to put them. I don't know when I'll boot to it next time. Outside of few specific use cases, it's just not for me.

But yeah, there just aren't any decent options out there these days...]]>
no_email@example.com (UCyborg) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9535#p9535 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 13:07:23 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9535#p9535
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Small Break From Eclipse :: Reply by Duke]]> http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9537#p9537 Interesting, thanks for the link :thumbup:]]> no_email@example.com (Duke) http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9537#p9537 Sun, 30 Aug 2026 20:40:34 +0000 http://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=851&p=9537#p9537