The official support forum for the browser platform based on Goanna/UXP by roytam1, servicing many Windows 2000/XP users (particularly those on older hardware).
To me 45 or any other number is not relevant.
I just want a browser with the multi process function enabled and a browser that could support the current FF addons that require atleast the 67+
Give up on this BOC shit altogether. Does the XP users need an email client that desperately? I personally not. Even if you give up on this BOC shit there is still Hyperbola project's email client and web suite as the backup. Listen to me, just give up on this BOC shit altogether. It's better for you.
duralite wrote: ↑02 Dec 2021, 22:56
To me 45 or any other number is not relevant.
I just want a browser with the multi process function enabled and a browser that could support the current FF addons that require atleast the 67+
Oh, just use Firefox. Any UXP based browser will be strictly single processed and multithreading. No chance of multiprocessing. Moonchild is personally against multiprocessing. I think he is very wrong about that. Multithreading is not at all suited for a browser. Multiprocessing is best suited for the browser. Chrome got it right and Firefox rightly followed Chrome.
Pale Moon devs are... weird to say the least. They seem to be pandering purely to angry nostalgiafags more than anything else at this point.
If you're going to do anything, try forking from SeaMonkey stable code - the developers there aren't dickheads and arguably got screwed harder than anyone by Mozilla, so seriously, why not approach them? Heck, you could help become part of their main development team too if need be and simply provide your unofficial builds as a "secondary thing" or something.
Discord also seems to work somewhat in it, at least in 2.53.x stable, which is based on FF60 but has security patches going up to 91.x ESR
Xi Jinping's Bear wrote: ↑10 Feb 2022, 01:38
Pale Moon devs are... weird to say the least. They seem to be pandering purely to angry nostalgiafags more than anything else at this point.
If you're going to do anything, try forking from SeaMonkey stable code - the developers there aren't dickheads and arguably got screwed harder than anyone by Mozilla, so seriously, why not approach them? Heck, you could help become part of their main development team too if need be and simply provide your unofficial builds as a "secondary thing" or something.
Discord also seems to work somewhat in it, at least in 2.53.x stable, which is based on FF60 but has security patches going up to 91.x ESR
seamonkey 2.53 is based on gecko56, not 60.
2.57a1 is based on 60esr, but it is quite broken.
Xi Jinping's Bear wrote: ↑10 Feb 2022, 01:38
Pale Moon devs are... weird to say the least. They seem to be pandering purely to angry nostalgiafags more than anything else at this point.
If you're going to do anything, try forking from SeaMonkey stable code - the developers there aren't dickheads and arguably got screwed harder than anyone by Mozilla, so seriously, why not approach them? Heck, you could help become part of their main development team too if need be and simply provide your unofficial builds as a "secondary thing" or something.
Discord also seems to work somewhat in it, at least in 2.53.x stable, which is based on FF60 but has security patches going up to 91.x ESR
seamonkey 2.53 is based on gecko56, not 60.
2.57a1 is based on 60esr, but it is quite broken.
If he read the SeaMonkey project blog he will not that confident in SeaMonkey: