<![CDATA[Eclipse Community]]> https://board.eclipse.cx Smartfeed extension for phpBB <![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Roti-Poulet]]> 2026-06-23T16:13:19+00:00 2026-06-23T16:13:19+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9167#p9167 <![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-23T19:34:17+00:00 2026-06-23T19:34:17+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9170#p9170
Roti-Poulet wrote: 23 Jun 2026, 16:13 Can someone give me the file please?
Here you go:
https://upload.disroot.org/r/kH1vB0GA#Ys2iNiE8nedhXPayNBC9O+fViN94dhbz7mvucSeI9GU=

Expire on 21 September 2026 at 19:25 UTC.]]>
Roti-Poulet wrote: 23 Jun 2026, 16:13 Can someone give me the file please?
Here you go:
https://upload.disroot.org/r/kH1vB0GA#Ys2iNiE8nedhXPayNBC9O+fViN94dhbz7mvucSeI9GU=

Expire on 21 September 2026 at 19:25 UTC.]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Roti-Poulet]]> 2026-06-25T08:04:08+00:00 2026-06-25T08:04:08+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9174#p9174 By the way, for everyone reading this, I made this project: https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 , and its probably the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7, and even some new titles:
-Resident Evil Village (8)
-Unreal Engine 4 (I got SunTemple to work, but I don't really know about real UE4 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!]]>
By the way, for everyone reading this, I made this project: https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 , and its probably the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7, and even some new titles:
-Resident Evil Village (8)
-Unreal Engine 4 (I got SunTemple to work, but I don't really know about real UE4 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-25T10:38:12+00:00 2026-06-25T10:38:12+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9176#p9176 ]]> ]]> <![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-28T08:40:29+00:00 2026-06-28T08:40:29+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9182#p9182
Roti-Poulet wrote: 25 Jun 2026, 08:04 Thanks Duke
By the way, for everyone reading this, I made this project: https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 , and its probably the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7, and even some new titles:
-Resident Evil Village (8)
-Unreal Engine 4 (I got SunTemple to work, but I don't really know about real UE4 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!
I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.]]>
Roti-Poulet wrote: 25 Jun 2026, 08:04 Thanks Duke
By the way, for everyone reading this, I made this project: https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 , and its probably the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7, and even some new titles:
-Resident Evil Village (8)
-Unreal Engine 4 (I got SunTemple to work, but I don't really know about real UE4 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!
I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-28T11:29:47+00:00 2026-06-28T11:29:47+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9184#p9184
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 08:40 I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.
Where is this simple cube test ?
This one ? : https://github.com/clandrew/spinningcube12]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 08:40 I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.
Where is this simple cube test ?
This one ? : https://github.com/clandrew/spinningcube12]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-28T11:37:45+00:00 2026-06-28T11:37:45+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9187#p9187
Duke wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 11:29
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 08:40 I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.
Where is this simple cube test ?
This one ? : https://github.com/clandrew/spinningcube12
That is the one I tried testing. I'm not sure what exactly was used in the screenshot, but it looks the same to me.]]>
Duke wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 11:29
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 08:40 I tried to use this on 8.1, but I couldn't seem to get anything to work, even the simple cube test just crashes on my end.
Where is this simple cube test ?
This one ? : https://github.com/clandrew/spinningcube12
That is the one I tried testing. I'm not sure what exactly was used in the screenshot, but it looks the same to me.]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Roti-Poulet]]> 2026-06-28T20:47:51+00:00 2026-06-28T20:47:51+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9190#p9190 <![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: DirectX 12 from Win10 1507 on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-28T22:30:24+00:00 2026-06-28T22:30:24+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=908&p=9191#p9191
Roti-Poulet wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 20:47 using CreateDXGIFactory2 (not supported with stock windows 7 dxgi)
In a previous post you said it should work on Windows 7:
Roti-Poulet wrote: 25 Jun 2026, 08:04 the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!
]]>
Roti-Poulet wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 20:47 using CreateDXGIFactory2 (not supported with stock windows 7 dxgi)
In a previous post you said it should work on Windows 7:
Roti-Poulet wrote: 25 Jun 2026, 08:04 the best DirectX12 patch for Windows 7, supporting programs without D3D12On7 games)

Games using CreateDXGIFactory2 are also supported!
]]>
<![CDATA[Compatibility Mods :: Dead Island 2 on Windows 8.1 and probably Windows 7 too (but I have not tested) :: Author the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-29T06:19:01+00:00 2026-06-29T06:19:01+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=982&p=9194#p9194 https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 with, I came found Dead Island 2, and went to give it a try. What surprised me was that it has a native DirectX 11 mode, and it kinda just works on 8.1 at least, albeit with one small modification. You will need to hex edit or CFF Explorer edit DeadIsland-Win64-Shipping.exe, and replace SetThreadDescription with SetLastError. After that, make a shortcut of the .exe, and right click the shortcut, and add ` -d3d11` to the end of the target, Apply, OK, and launch the game with the shortcut, and it just works. If using Steam or some other client that supports launch options, you might want to add -d3d11 there instead.

The game runs fairly well, I can do 1440p Medium with a GTX 1080 and I stay above 60 FPS for the most part. However it stutters a lot. I'm not sure if that's a UE5 thing, a DX11 thing, or a Windows pre-10 thing with this game.]]>
https://github.com/Roti-Poulet/DirectX12On7 with, I came found Dead Island 2, and went to give it a try. What surprised me was that it has a native DirectX 11 mode, and it kinda just works on 8.1 at least, albeit with one small modification. You will need to hex edit or CFF Explorer edit DeadIsland-Win64-Shipping.exe, and replace SetThreadDescription with SetLastError. After that, make a shortcut of the .exe, and right click the shortcut, and add ` -d3d11` to the end of the target, Apply, OK, and launch the game with the shortcut, and it just works. If using Steam or some other client that supports launch options, you might want to add -d3d11 there instead.

The game runs fairly well, I can do 1440p Medium with a GTX 1080 and I stay above 60 FPS for the most part. However it stutters a lot. I'm not sure if that's a UE5 thing, a DX11 thing, or a Windows pre-10 thing with this game.]]>
<![CDATA[Research Network :: Either fully remove Rust from Firefox or backport engine changes from Quantum onto UXP :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-07-08T00:21:05+00:00 2026-07-08T00:21:05+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=969&p=9206#p9206
Currently just doing work here.
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox-old/tree/esr60new

However once I get it to a decent state, I'll move it here and have issues and debug builds and proper stuff for testing and all.
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/eXPlorer]]>

Currently just doing work here.
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox-old/tree/esr60new

However once I get it to a decent state, I'll move it here and have issues and debug builds and proper stuff for testing and all.
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/eXPlorer]]>
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by UCyborg]]> 2026-06-09T17:17:37+00:00 2026-06-09T17:17:37+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9128#p9128
UCyborg wrote: 02 May 2026, 21:21 Does disabling smooth scrolling work on Firefox 148? I'm trying out FireDragon 12.9.1 (based on Fx 148), doesn't work there.
Commented out bunch of things in firedragon.cfg in install dir and smooth scrolling can be normally disabled now. I suspect Smooth Fox section was responsible.]]>
UCyborg wrote: 02 May 2026, 21:21 Does disabling smooth scrolling work on Firefox 148? I'm trying out FireDragon 12.9.1 (based on Fx 148), doesn't work there.
Commented out bunch of things in firedragon.cfg in install dir and smooth scrolling can be normally disabled now. I suspect Smooth Fox section was responsible.]]>
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by UCyborg]]> 2026-06-29T19:40:24+00:00 2026-06-29T19:40:24+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9199#p9199
Firefox-based browsers just seem to have other bugs. Huge RAM waster with slightly more tabs, makes page file explode and then takes a good while before all that process spam manages to exit, video playback sometimes just craps out...heck, on another family's member laptop with some Intel Celeron, Firefox still struggles with videos immensely. I finally taught the owner to use Pale Moon for those sites.

And the font rendering, it's just awful, I need proper tuned ClearType rendered fonts that current Windows versions can provide, none of that crappy Skia that is being forced down everyone's throat. No amount of CSS hacking gets it right with Skia, I feel like the hole is being drilled into my brain.]]>

Firefox-based browsers just seem to have other bugs. Huge RAM waster with slightly more tabs, makes page file explode and then takes a good while before all that process spam manages to exit, video playback sometimes just craps out...heck, on another family's member laptop with some Intel Celeron, Firefox still struggles with videos immensely. I finally taught the owner to use Pale Moon for those sites.

And the font rendering, it's just awful, I need proper tuned ClearType rendered fonts that current Windows versions can provide, none of that crappy Skia that is being forced down everyone's throat. No amount of CSS hacking gets it right with Skia, I feel like the hole is being drilled into my brain.]]>
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-29T19:49:26+00:00 2026-06-29T19:49:26+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9200#p9200
https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/eXPlorer

Currently trying to trace and solve issue where Cairo results in tab text shifting between proper and blurry in the post-Quantum releases.

Also the rendering mode messes with the text rendering too. D3D11 messes with it somehow and makes it look kinda bad. Compare PM with D3D11 accel to basic accel on https://eclipse.cx, and https://fontgammatest.replit.app/

Saving grace though is that Lun3r/NM with D3D9 has no such font issues, and looks just as good as basic.]]>

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/eXPlorer

Currently trying to trace and solve issue where Cairo results in tab text shifting between proper and blurry in the post-Quantum releases.

Also the rendering mode messes with the text rendering too. D3D11 messes with it somehow and makes it look kinda bad. Compare PM with D3D11 accel to basic accel on https://eclipse.cx, and https://fontgammatest.replit.app/

Saving grace though is that Lun3r/NM with D3D9 has no such font issues, and looks just as good as basic.]]>
<![CDATA[General Software & Hardware :: (Tangent alert) Why does modern Firefox suck so much? :: Reply by UCyborg]]> 2026-06-30T12:05:35+00:00 2026-06-30T12:05:35+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=967&p=9202#p9202
Years ago, I did something similar with Drakan, added an option to alter its pixel shifting logic so fonts wouldn't get messed up with forced MSAA. The original code must have been solving similar problem with fonts on Voodoo 3D accelerator cards, at least judging by results in an emulator.

Either way, with UXP browsers, D3D11 + D2D (defaults) is the only combination that does it the way I/my eyes like it.

But, Pale Moon project itself is underfunded and lacks manpower to keep up with demands modern web, the stability took a noticeable nosedive in recent months.]]>

Years ago, I did something similar with Drakan, added an option to alter its pixel shifting logic so fonts wouldn't get messed up with forced MSAA. The original code must have been solving similar problem with fonts on Voodoo 3D accelerator cards, at least judging by results in an emulator.

Either way, with UXP browsers, D3D11 + D2D (defaults) is the only combination that does it the way I/my eyes like it.

But, Pale Moon project itself is underfunded and lacks manpower to keep up with demands modern web, the stability took a noticeable nosedive in recent months.]]>
<![CDATA[Browsers :: Extended support for Firefox 115 ESR :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-15T19:01:47+00:00 2026-06-15T19:01:47+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=748&p=9155#p9155 https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/115.37.0esr/

Release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/115.37.0/releasenotes/]]>
https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/115.37.0esr/

Release notes:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/115.37.0/releasenotes/]]>
<![CDATA[Windows XP & Server 2003 :: List of anti-malware still supported on Windows XP and up :: Reply by JodyThornton]]> 2026-06-20T16:27:06+00:00 2026-06-20T16:27:06+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=945&p=9165#p9165
teknixstuff wrote: 29 May 2026, 08:08
wuggy wrote: 29 May 2026, 00:17 doesn't MSE (Microsoft Security Essentials) still get updated on XP?
Indeed. There's also [MBAM 3.5.1](https://downloads.malwarebytes.com/file/mb3_legacy), which similarly still gets updates.
My understanding was that updates for Malwarebytes v3.5.1 stopped in March 2024. I remember uninstalling it for that reason.

Here you go:
https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/312351-legacy-malwarebytes-v351-product-lifecycle-and-eol/]]>
teknixstuff wrote: 29 May 2026, 08:08
wuggy wrote: 29 May 2026, 00:17 doesn't MSE (Microsoft Security Essentials) still get updated on XP?
Indeed. There's also [MBAM 3.5.1](https://downloads.malwarebytes.com/file/mb3_legacy), which similarly still gets updates.
My understanding was that updates for Malwarebytes v3.5.1 stopped in March 2024. I remember uninstalling it for that reason.

Here you go:
https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/312351-legacy-malwarebytes-v351-product-lifecycle-and-eol/]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: profiles cause r3dfox to crash :: Author lundegart]]> 2026-06-22T20:23:22+00:00 2026-06-22T20:23:22+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=981&p=9166#p9166 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: profiles cause r3dfox to crash :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-23T19:30:28+00:00 2026-06-23T19:30:28+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=981&p=9169#p9169 https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/187]]> https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/187]]> <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: profiles cause r3dfox to crash :: Reply by lundegart]]> 2026-06-24T20:01:55+00:00 2026-06-24T20:01:55+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=981&p=9173#p9173 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: profiles cause r3dfox to crash :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-25T10:36:45+00:00 2026-06-25T10:36:45+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=981&p=9175#p9175
lundegart wrote: 24 Jun 2026, 20:01 what can I do?
Not much. Just wait for a new release with the hope it will be fixed. 🤞]]>
lundegart wrote: 24 Jun 2026, 20:01 what can I do?
Not much. Just wait for a new release with the hope it will be fixed. 🤞]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: profiles cause r3dfox to crash :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-28T08:39:08+00:00 2026-06-28T08:39:08+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=981&p=9181#p9181 https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/releases/tag/151.0.2]]> https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/releases/tag/151.0.2]]> <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-09T19:41:00+00:00 2026-06-09T19:41:00+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9129#p9129
Duke wrote: 26 May 2026, 22:39 Hardware decoding is still broken in R3dfox v151.0.2 :(
Might be fixed in Firefox 151.0.4:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/151.0.4/releasenotes/
Fixed an issue where Firefox could fall back to software rendering on some older GPUs, reducing graphics performance. (Bug 2043249)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043249]]>
Duke wrote: 26 May 2026, 22:39 Hardware decoding is still broken in R3dfox v151.0.2 :(
Might be fixed in Firefox 151.0.4:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/151.0.4/releasenotes/
Fixed an issue where Firefox could fall back to software rendering on some older GPUs, reducing graphics performance. (Bug 2043249)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043249]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-10T16:57:22+00:00 2026-06-10T16:57:22+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9130#p9130
Duke wrote: 09 Jun 2026, 19:41
Duke wrote: 26 May 2026, 22:39 Hardware decoding is still broken in R3dfox v151.0.2 :(
Might be fixed in Firefox 151.0.4:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/151.0.4/releasenotes/
Fixed an issue where Firefox could fall back to software rendering on some older GPUs, reducing graphics performance. (Bug 2043249)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043249
Hardware acceleration is back with Plasmafox v153.0a1 :thumbup:

But don't do that:
Plasmafox-Search.png
Never change my default search engine. Please.


And BTW, Firefox v152 is to be released next Tuesday, the 16th of June ;)

Attachments


Plasmafox-Search.png (4.81 KiB)

]]>
Duke wrote: 09 Jun 2026, 19:41
Duke wrote: 26 May 2026, 22:39 Hardware decoding is still broken in R3dfox v151.0.2 :(
Might be fixed in Firefox 151.0.4:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/151.0.4/releasenotes/
Fixed an issue where Firefox could fall back to software rendering on some older GPUs, reducing graphics performance. (Bug 2043249)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043249
Hardware acceleration is back with Plasmafox v153.0a1 :thumbup:

But don't do that:
Plasmafox-Search.png
Never change my default search engine. Please.


And BTW, Firefox v152 is to be released next Tuesday, the 16th of June ;)

Attachments


Plasmafox-Search.png (4.81 KiB)

]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-10T17:00:22+00:00 2026-06-10T17:00:22+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9131#p9131
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 But don't do that:

Plasmafox-Search.png

Never change my default search engine. Please.
I didn't touch anything regarding that so I assume that must be a Mozilla bug. This is a nightly build after all.
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 And BTW, Firefox v152 is to be released next Tuesday, the 16th of June ;)
Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.]]>
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 But don't do that:

Plasmafox-Search.png

Never change my default search engine. Please.
I didn't touch anything regarding that so I assume that must be a Mozilla bug. This is a nightly build after all.
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 And BTW, Firefox v152 is to be released next Tuesday, the 16th of June ;)
Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-10T17:04:21+00:00 2026-06-10T17:04:21+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9132#p9132
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 I didn't touch anything regarding that so I assume that must be a Mozilla bug. This is a nightly build after all.
Looks like it's a LibreWolf thing because the 'Learn more' link is: https://support.librewolf.net/search-engine-removal
But when I click on it it's redirecting me to: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/search-engine-removal]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 I didn't touch anything regarding that so I assume that must be a Mozilla bug. This is a nightly build after all.
Looks like it's a LibreWolf thing because the 'Learn more' link is: https://support.librewolf.net/search-engine-removal
But when I click on it it's redirecting me to: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/search-engine-removal]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-10T17:06:10+00:00 2026-06-10T17:06:10+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9133#p9133 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-10T17:09:54+00:00 2026-06-10T17:09:54+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9134#p9134 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Taiclaw]]> 2026-06-10T23:10:47+00:00 2026-06-10T23:10:47+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9135#p9135 Plasmafox (all versions) is incompatible with Firefox Language Packs! :problem:]]> Plasmafox (all versions) is incompatible with Firefox Language Packs! :problem:]]> <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-11T08:26:53+00:00 2026-06-11T08:26:53+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9136#p9136 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-11T09:41:14+00:00 2026-06-11T09:41:14+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9139#p9139
the_r3dacted wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 08:26 I'm just not going to bother with language packs at this point.
Don't bother with language packs but don't block them from being installed.
I know many people who won't use a browser if it's not in their native language.]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 08:26 I'm just not going to bother with language packs at this point.
Don't bother with language packs but don't block them from being installed.
I know many people who won't use a browser if it's not in their native language.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-11T11:28:44+00:00 2026-06-11T11:28:44+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9140#p9140 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-11T14:58:48+00:00 2026-06-11T14:58:48+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9141#p9141
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 Hardware acceleration is back with Plasmafox v153.0a1 :thumbup:
Looks like it's kind of borked though, because I've tried with a quite old graphics card and about:support shows hardware acceleration decoding available for H.264 + VP9 + AV1.
VP9 I'm not sure, or maybe its very first generation. But AV1, no way, not a single chance at all! :?

EDIT: after more investigation not even VP9 with this 12 years old Nvidia card.]]>
Duke wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 16:57 Hardware acceleration is back with Plasmafox v153.0a1 :thumbup:
Looks like it's kind of borked though, because I've tried with a quite old graphics card and about:support shows hardware acceleration decoding available for H.264 + VP9 + AV1.
VP9 I'm not sure, or maybe its very first generation. But AV1, no way, not a single chance at all! :?

EDIT: after more investigation not even VP9 with this 12 years old Nvidia card.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> 2026-06-11T21:15:34+00:00 2026-06-11T21:15:34+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9142#p9142
the_r3dacted wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 11:28 I'm not intentionally blocking it, it's just multiple changes are not compatible with them.
... Less than a year ago, when r3dfox was in the lower 140s, Firefox langpacks were fully compatible with it, leaving only the "redfox configurations" part of "about:preferences" untranslated (remaining in en-US); then, the "LibreWolf-ification" of r3dfox started gradually to take place, and that part was a conscious/intentional change; LibreWolf itself has become incompatible with upstream Firefox, to the point that LW now has to supply its own langpacks for i18n purposes...

And r3dfox now is in a state where, due to "multiple changes" (many originating from the LW fork), it has also become incompatible with Fx langpacks (and, I assume, also with LW langpacks) :( :cry: ; GH issues about this breakage have already been reported:

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/168

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/172

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/178

So, with much respect to the r3dfox author, the Fx langpacks breakage, for me, came as a consequence of certain concrete intentions, i.e. it's not a random accident ;) ...

Another thing that kind of irks me is the frequent comparison to the MyPal68 browser; they are different projects, aren't they? With different target groups, probably (MyPal68 mainly appealing to XP-die-hards); I appreciate that their authors may share code/ideas/etc., as is the case with the e3k Chinese dev, but why should it be acceptable for a r3dfox user that MyPal68 is also broken when it comes to Fx langpacks? FWIW, the Russian community of MyPal68 users has contributed this; I don't think we'll see something like that for r3dfox and, in any case, I don't speak Russian myself :P ...

Regards.]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 11:28 I'm not intentionally blocking it, it's just multiple changes are not compatible with them.
... Less than a year ago, when r3dfox was in the lower 140s, Firefox langpacks were fully compatible with it, leaving only the "redfox configurations" part of "about:preferences" untranslated (remaining in en-US); then, the "LibreWolf-ification" of r3dfox started gradually to take place, and that part was a conscious/intentional change; LibreWolf itself has become incompatible with upstream Firefox, to the point that LW now has to supply its own langpacks for i18n purposes...

And r3dfox now is in a state where, due to "multiple changes" (many originating from the LW fork), it has also become incompatible with Fx langpacks (and, I assume, also with LW langpacks) :( :cry: ; GH issues about this breakage have already been reported:

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/168

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/172

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/178

So, with much respect to the r3dfox author, the Fx langpacks breakage, for me, came as a consequence of certain concrete intentions, i.e. it's not a random accident ;) ...

Another thing that kind of irks me is the frequent comparison to the MyPal68 browser; they are different projects, aren't they? With different target groups, probably (MyPal68 mainly appealing to XP-die-hards); I appreciate that their authors may share code/ideas/etc., as is the case with the e3k Chinese dev, but why should it be acceptable for a r3dfox user that MyPal68 is also broken when it comes to Fx langpacks? FWIW, the Russian community of MyPal68 users has contributed this; I don't think we'll see something like that for r3dfox and, in any case, I don't speak Russian myself :P ...

Regards.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Nobody]]> 2026-06-12T00:21:14+00:00 2026-06-12T00:21:14+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9143#p9143 If you switch the setting under Privacy & Security > Enable DNS over HTTPS using from "Default Protection" to "Increased Protection," R3dfox will no longer start.]]> If you switch the setting under Privacy & Security > Enable DNS over HTTPS using from "Default Protection" to "Increased Protection," R3dfox will no longer start.]]> <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> 2026-06-12T00:42:56+00:00 2026-06-12T00:42:56+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9144#p9144
Nobody wrote: 12 Jun 2026, 00:21 If you switch the setting under Privacy & Security > Enable DNS over HTTPS using from "Default Protection" to "Increased Protection," R3dfox will no longer start.
Already known and reported bug ;) :

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/145

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/162]]>
Nobody wrote: 12 Jun 2026, 00:21 If you switch the setting under Privacy & Security > Enable DNS over HTTPS using from "Default Protection" to "Increased Protection," R3dfox will no longer start.
Already known and reported bug ;) :

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/145

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/162]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-12T07:27:23+00:00 2026-06-12T07:27:23+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9145#p9145
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 Less than a year ago, when r3dfox was in the lower 140s, Firefox langpacks were fully compatible with it, leaving only the "redfox configurations" part of "about:preferences" untranslated (remaining in en-US); then, the "LibreWolf-ification" of r3dfox started gradually to take place

And r3dfox now is in a state where, due to "multiple changes" (many originating from the LW fork), it has also become incompatible with Fx langpacks
Yes, I totally agree and this is a real problem for many people.
LibreWolf bits when it's about security, and that doesn't mean anonymity, are ok but that shouldn't break such basic features like language packs.]]>
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 Less than a year ago, when r3dfox was in the lower 140s, Firefox langpacks were fully compatible with it, leaving only the "redfox configurations" part of "about:preferences" untranslated (remaining in en-US); then, the "LibreWolf-ification" of r3dfox started gradually to take place

And r3dfox now is in a state where, due to "multiple changes" (many originating from the LW fork), it has also become incompatible with Fx langpacks
Yes, I totally agree and this is a real problem for many people.
LibreWolf bits when it's about security, and that doesn't mean anonymity, are ok but that shouldn't break such basic features like language packs.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Milkyway]]> 2026-06-12T14:27:48+00:00 2026-06-12T20:45:56+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9147#p9147 I'm not a native english speaker so bear with me.
First things first, many thanks for this fork :-)

Has anybody else had problems with logging in twitch.tv ?
When I try, it says my browser is not a supported one.
This happened since some months ago, and it's still happening today,
with the latest version of r3dfox I have, ie Plasmafox 153.0a1 (2026-06-09) (64-bit).
I tried with a user-agent override with
- general.useragent.override.twitch.tv
- Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:149.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/149.0
but it didn't work.
Any ideas?
Should I wait for future release?

Regards

Edit: I tried R3dfox 150.0.3 64-bit and it worked ! :-)
Maybe because it didn't have umatrix ( I added it later ) ? Who knows...]]>
I'm not a native english speaker so bear with me.
First things first, many thanks for this fork :-)

Has anybody else had problems with logging in twitch.tv ?
When I try, it says my browser is not a supported one.
This happened since some months ago, and it's still happening today,
with the latest version of r3dfox I have, ie Plasmafox 153.0a1 (2026-06-09) (64-bit).
I tried with a user-agent override with
- general.useragent.override.twitch.tv
- Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:149.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/149.0
but it didn't work.
Any ideas?
Should I wait for future release?

Regards

Edit: I tried R3dfox 150.0.3 64-bit and it worked ! :-)
Maybe because it didn't have umatrix ( I added it later ) ? Who knows...]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-12T16:28:52+00:00 2026-06-12T16:28:52+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9148#p9148
Milkyway wrote: 12 Jun 2026, 14:27 Has anybody else had problems with logging in twitch.tv ?
When I try, it says my browser is not a supported one.
This happened since some months ago, and it's still happening today,
with the latest version of r3dfox I have, ie 153.0a1 (2026-06-09) (64-bit).
I tried with a user-agent override with
- general.useragent.override.twitch.tv
- Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:149.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/149.0
but it didn't work.
Hi and welcome to the forum :)

No problem with Twitch.tv for me with both R3dfox v151.0.2 and Plasmafox v153.0a1.
I'm using: "general.useragent.override" = "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.0"

I don't like to use the %OS_SLICE% thing because Firefox v151 is not supposed to run on Windows 7 or 8. Some sites may detect that.

But the version number has to be changed on each new version of Firefox because some sites don't like browsers which are more than one or two versions older than the current release version.
Current release of Firefox is v151 but v152 is to be released on next tuesday the 16th of June.]]>
Milkyway wrote: 12 Jun 2026, 14:27 Has anybody else had problems with logging in twitch.tv ?
When I try, it says my browser is not a supported one.
This happened since some months ago, and it's still happening today,
with the latest version of r3dfox I have, ie 153.0a1 (2026-06-09) (64-bit).
I tried with a user-agent override with
- general.useragent.override.twitch.tv
- Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE%; rv:149.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/149.0
but it didn't work.
Hi and welcome to the forum :)

No problem with Twitch.tv for me with both R3dfox v151.0.2 and Plasmafox v153.0a1.
I'm using: "general.useragent.override" = "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:151.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/151.0"

I don't like to use the %OS_SLICE% thing because Firefox v151 is not supposed to run on Windows 7 or 8. Some sites may detect that.

But the version number has to be changed on each new version of Firefox because some sites don't like browsers which are more than one or two versions older than the current release version.
Current release of Firefox is v151 but v152 is to be released on next tuesday the 16th of June.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Milkyway]]> 2026-06-12T20:53:15+00:00 2026-06-12T20:53:15+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9149#p9149 ( I hope ) I got the problem solved.
But maybe in the future your solution could come in handy.

Regards]]>
( I hope ) I got the problem solved.
But maybe in the future your solution could come in handy.

Regards]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by UCyborg]]> 2026-06-17T15:36:59+00:00 2026-06-17T15:36:59+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9156#p9156
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 "LibreWolf-ification"
Personally, I despise it. Just more things to get in the way. If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf. But, never cared for it.]]>
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 "LibreWolf-ification"
Personally, I despise it. Just more things to get in the way. If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf. But, never cared for it.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-17T19:49:39+00:00 2026-06-17T19:49:39+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9157#p9157
UCyborg wrote: 17 Jun 2026, 15:36 If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf.
Like Firefox, there is no LibreWolf anymore for Windows 7 & 8. There have been some builds around for older OSes but it looks like no one is doing it on a regular basis.
To me R3dfox is in between Firefox and LibreWolf and I like it like that. Some kind of 'light' FF+LW.]]>
UCyborg wrote: 17 Jun 2026, 15:36 If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf.
Like Firefox, there is no LibreWolf anymore for Windows 7 & 8. There have been some builds around for older OSes but it looks like no one is doing it on a regular basis.
To me R3dfox is in between Firefox and LibreWolf and I like it like that. Some kind of 'light' FF+LW.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> 2026-06-17T21:25:52+00:00 2026-06-17T21:25:52+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9158#p9158
UCyborg wrote: 17 Jun 2026, 15:36
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 "LibreWolf-ification"
Just more things to get in the way. If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf.
Exactly :clap: ; and if you're frequenting the GitHub Issue Tracker, you'll see that many of the recently reported issues are due to imported "features" from LW; and with respect to our moderator, Duke, I've never liked "hybrid" solutions ;) ...

One of my older laptops still has Vista SP2 32-bit; I had migrated from 360EEv13 to KafanMiniBrowser to Super***m and then to r3dfox (because I prefer Firefox to Chromium), also using in parallel the Fx-for-Win7 fork (since the time it brought support to Vista); that last fork has ceased supporting Vista recently :( , and on r3dfox I've stayed on one of the 140esr versions prior to the LW "imports"; GitHub still works fine here, but when it ultimately breaks (when Fx-140esr becomes EoL), I'm not sure what will follow for me; back to one of the Chromium forks? :think:]]>
UCyborg wrote: 17 Jun 2026, 15:36
GoodConscience wrote: 11 Jun 2026, 21:15 "LibreWolf-ification"
Just more things to get in the way. If I wanted LibreWolf, I'd download LibreWolf.
Exactly :clap: ; and if you're frequenting the GitHub Issue Tracker, you'll see that many of the recently reported issues are due to imported "features" from LW; and with respect to our moderator, Duke, I've never liked "hybrid" solutions ;) ...

One of my older laptops still has Vista SP2 32-bit; I had migrated from 360EEv13 to KafanMiniBrowser to Super***m and then to r3dfox (because I prefer Firefox to Chromium), also using in parallel the Fx-for-Win7 fork (since the time it brought support to Vista); that last fork has ceased supporting Vista recently :( , and on r3dfox I've stayed on one of the 140esr versions prior to the LW "imports"; GitHub still works fine here, but when it ultimately breaks (when Fx-140esr becomes EoL), I'm not sure what will follow for me; back to one of the Chromium forks? :think:]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by UCyborg]]> 2026-06-18T09:10:05+00:00 2026-06-18T09:10:05+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9159#p9159 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-19T07:08:13+00:00 2026-06-19T07:08:13+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9160#p9160
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.
It's too late now for a v151.0.4 but I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.
It's too late now for a v151.0.4 but I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-28T11:35:33+00:00 2026-06-28T11:35:33+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9185#p9185
Duke wrote: 19 Jun 2026, 07:08 I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)
Any chance ?
Does Plasmafox v153.0a1 include Firefox v152 security patches ?]]>
Duke wrote: 19 Jun 2026, 07:08 I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)
Any chance ?
Does Plasmafox v153.0a1 include Firefox v152 security patches ?]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-28T11:38:40+00:00 2026-06-28T11:38:40+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9188#p9188 <![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by eclstedt]]> 2026-06-28T11:42:53+00:00 2026-06-28T11:42:53+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9189#p9189
Duke wrote: 19 Jun 2026, 07:08
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.
It's too late now for a v151.0.4 but I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)

Personally, I'm only interested in ESR releases. I don't need new features, I need a good, fast, functional browser.]]>
Duke wrote: 19 Jun 2026, 07:08
the_r3dacted wrote: 10 Jun 2026, 17:00 Idk if I will do a 151.0.4, but I might do a 152 depending on how similar the code is between 153.0a1 and 152.0.
It's too late now for a v151.0.4 but I believe many of us are waiting for a v152. ;)

Personally, I'm only interested in ESR releases. I don't need new features, I need a good, fast, functional browser.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-28T23:24:24+00:00 2026-06-28T23:24:24+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9192#p9192
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 11:38 it's a kinda early 153 build.
In fact I think nightly/alpha builds are pretty useless for the end user.]]>
the_r3dacted wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 11:38 it's a kinda early 153 build.
In fact I think nightly/alpha builds are pretty useless for the end user.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by GoodConscience]]> 2026-06-29T00:10:00+00:00 2026-06-29T00:10:00+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9193#p9193
Duke wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 23:24
In fact I think nightly/alpha builds are pretty useless for the end user.
I beg to differ; as a Mozilla tester for many years (v21.0a1 to v53.0a1, when Vista was still supported), I used the Firefox Nightly builds (as my main browser) quite a lot; moving to recent times ;) , in the case of the "e3k" builds I prefer his "a1" releases to his "stable" ones because the former do allow for the installation of unsigned extensions, while the latter don't (same as his upstream, i.e. Mozilla); thankfully, the r3dfox builds have this "feature" enabled on all branches (release/stable, esr, beta, a1/plasmafox) ...]]>
Duke wrote: 28 Jun 2026, 23:24
In fact I think nightly/alpha builds are pretty useless for the end user.
I beg to differ; as a Mozilla tester for many years (v21.0a1 to v53.0a1, when Vista was still supported), I used the Firefox Nightly builds (as my main browser) quite a lot; moving to recent times ;) , in the case of the "e3k" builds I prefer his "a1" releases to his "stable" ones because the former do allow for the installation of unsigned extensions, while the latter don't (same as his upstream, i.e. Mozilla); thankfully, the r3dfox builds have this "feature" enabled on all branches (release/stable, esr, beta, a1/plasmafox) ...]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by the_r3dacted]]> 2026-06-29T06:55:18+00:00 2026-06-29T06:55:18+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9195#p9195
For r3dfox I cared less about it, more so just wanting three different brandings of browser to use so none conflict. r3dfox, r3dfox ESR, and Plasmafox. Also part of the reason I revived it for 152+ when it was last a 133 build.]]>

For r3dfox I cared less about it, more so just wanting three different brandings of browser to use so none conflict. r3dfox, r3dfox ESR, and Plasmafox. Also part of the reason I revived it for 152+ when it was last a 133 build.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-29T10:27:13+00:00 2026-06-29T10:27:13+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9196#p9196 https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/153.0a1/releasenotes/

While Firefox v152.0 was released on the 16th of June:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/152.0/releasenotes/

So I guess v152.0 release is more up to date, especially about security patches, than v153.0 alpha 1.

I understand the devs want us to test some things but alpha builds should not be used on a daily basis for the vast majority of end users.]]>
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/153.0a1/releasenotes/

While Firefox v152.0 was released on the 16th of June:
https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/152.0/releasenotes/

So I guess v152.0 release is more up to date, especially about security patches, than v153.0 alpha 1.

I understand the devs want us to test some things but alpha builds should not be used on a daily basis for the vast majority of end users.]]>
<![CDATA[Eclipse r3dfox browser :: r3dfox, a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows Vista, 7, and 8! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-07-05T00:01:17+00:00 2026-07-05T00:01:17+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=623&p=9203#p9203 https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v152.0.4]]> https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v152.0.4]]> <![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-12T22:39:42+00:00 2026-06-12T22:39:42+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9150#p9150
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Revert "Bug 2027433 use nullptr for silent up-mix channels" (4d9fe0ca23)
- Revert "Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero in AudioChannelsDownMix()" (cbdec72879)
- Revert "Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero in InterleaveAndConvertBuffer()" (68b774798b)
- [DOM] Provide more silent audio processing frames. (f83dd5bf22)
- Issue #3111 - Clean up logic in SweepFinalizationRegistries. (b336d24faf)

Official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build:
- [Pale-Moon] Adjust default theme to handle adjusted metrics for border truncation. (d7d7589555)

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

My changes since my last build:
- Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "Implement FinalizationRegistry" and related commits.""" (ff2a1248c4)

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260613-3219d2d-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260613-d849524bd-uxp-ec5b4aa693-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Revert "Bug 2027433 use nullptr for silent up-mix channels" (4d9fe0ca23)
- Revert "Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero in AudioChannelsDownMix()" (cbdec72879)
- Revert "Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero in InterleaveAndConvertBuffer()" (68b774798b)
- [DOM] Provide more silent audio processing frames. (f83dd5bf22)
- Issue #3111 - Clean up logic in SweepFinalizationRegistries. (b336d24faf)

Official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build:
- [Pale-Moon] Adjust default theme to handle adjusted metrics for border truncation. (d7d7589555)

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

My changes since my last build:
- Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "Implement FinalizationRegistry" and related commits.""" (ff2a1248c4)

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-12T22:39:53+00:00 2026-06-12T22:39:53+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9151#p9151
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260613-40a79c75-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260613-40a79c75-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260613-id-656ea98-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260613-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>

Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260613-40a79c75-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260613-40a79c75-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260613-id-656ea98-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260613-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-ec5b4aa693-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-12T22:40:05+00:00 2026-06-12T22:40:05+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9152#p9152 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260613-3f8026b8c-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260613-3f8026b8c-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- Revert "import from UXP: Bug 2027433 use nullptr for silent up-mix channels (42f1ba1d)" (19975c09c)
- Revert "import from UXP: Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero (83ef39ff)" (bbaac4291)
- Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "Implement FinalizationRegistry" and related commits.""" (f2accccb8)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Provide more silent audio processing frames. (f83dd5bf) (64ed6203f)
- import from UXP: Issue #3111 - Clean up logic in SweepFinalizationRegistries. (b336d24f) (3f8026b8c)]]>
* Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260613-3f8026b8c-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260613-3f8026b8c-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- Revert "import from UXP: Bug 2027433 use nullptr for silent up-mix channels (42f1ba1d)" (19975c09c)
- Revert "import from UXP: Bug 2027433 Treat null input channels as zero (83ef39ff)" (bbaac4291)
- Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "Implement FinalizationRegistry" and related commits.""" (f2accccb8)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Provide more silent audio processing frames. (f83dd5bf) (64ed6203f)
- import from UXP: Issue #3111 - Clean up logic in SweepFinalizationRegistries. (b336d24f) (3f8026b8c)]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-19T23:06:44+00:00 2026-06-19T23:06:44+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9162#p9162
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Issue #2306 - Re-introduce pref for WeakRef API spec. (8eac1db64b)
- Issue #2306 - Enable full weakref by default in platform. (0bd0d0a296)
- Issue #3122 - Exclude local resources from <base> CSP checks. (692606e89c)
- Bug 2029066 - Remove Sinking of Live instructions. (2712943075)
- Bug 2029765 - avoid refcount over-release in nssTokenObjectCache error path [@ nssToken_Destroy]. (13d8737677)
- [network] Make keep-alive pref Atomic. (f20e0799a0)
- [DOM] Reject too large mLength in MutableBlobStorage::WriteRunnable. (b60661dfe1)
- Bug 2023478 - improve handling of escape sequences in pk11uri_ParseAttributes. (7ae6442d99)
- Bug 2033848 - Use non-default response ID for GTK file picker accept button. r=stransky (81babad165)
- [DOM] Zero-initialize ThreadSharedFloatArrayBufferList. (5ab14e5932)
- No issue - Use ImmGCPtr for module meta data visits. (0bdcc65c4c)
- [parser] Better align with spec definition of adding nodes. (a50e1d7ae5)
- [DOM] Avoid over-optimizing some getter/function calls. (a83b6f74bb)
- [gfx] Check more offsets during CFF subsetting. (9a457cbfd9)
- [network] Make HttpBaseChannel::mLoadFlags atomic. (100f6aaf5b)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260620-3219d2d-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260620-d849524bd-uxp-f718564719-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Issue #2306 - Re-introduce pref for WeakRef API spec. (8eac1db64b)
- Issue #2306 - Enable full weakref by default in platform. (0bd0d0a296)
- Issue #3122 - Exclude local resources from <base> CSP checks. (692606e89c)
- Bug 2029066 - Remove Sinking of Live instructions. (2712943075)
- Bug 2029765 - avoid refcount over-release in nssTokenObjectCache error path [@ nssToken_Destroy]. (13d8737677)
- [network] Make keep-alive pref Atomic. (f20e0799a0)
- [DOM] Reject too large mLength in MutableBlobStorage::WriteRunnable. (b60661dfe1)
- Bug 2023478 - improve handling of escape sequences in pk11uri_ParseAttributes. (7ae6442d99)
- Bug 2033848 - Use non-default response ID for GTK file picker accept button. r=stransky (81babad165)
- [DOM] Zero-initialize ThreadSharedFloatArrayBufferList. (5ab14e5932)
- No issue - Use ImmGCPtr for module meta data visits. (0bdcc65c4c)
- [parser] Better align with spec definition of adding nodes. (a50e1d7ae5)
- [DOM] Avoid over-optimizing some getter/function calls. (a83b6f74bb)
- [gfx] Check more offsets during CFF subsetting. (9a457cbfd9)
- [network] Make HttpBaseChannel::mLoadFlags atomic. (100f6aaf5b)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-19T23:06:55+00:00 2026-06-19T23:06:55+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9163#p9163
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260620-40a79c75-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260620-40a79c75-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260620-id-656ea98-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260620-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>

Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260620-40a79c75-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260620-40a79c75-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260620-id-656ea98-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260620-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-f718564719-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-19T23:07:05+00:00 2026-06-19T23:07:05+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9164#p9164 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260620-962fb7e60-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260620-962fb7e60-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- ported from UXP: Issue #2306 - Re-introduce pref for WeakRef API spec. (8eac1db6) (938e5c744)
- import from UXP: Issue #2306 - Enable full weakref by default in platform. (0bd0d0a2) (74824f24b)
- import from UXP: Issue #3122 - Exclude local resources from <base> CSP checks. (692606e8) (6fc95b735)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2029066 - Remove Sinking of Live instructions. (27129430) (e89f0a52f)
- import from UXP: Bug 2029765 - avoid refcount over-release in nssTokenObjectCache error path [@ nssToken_Destroy]. (13d87376) (73b5f11e4)
- import from UXP: [network] Make keep-alive pref Atomic. (f20e0799) (0d6196afd)
- ported from UXP: [DOM] Reject too large mLength in MutableBlobStorage::WriteRunnable. (b60661df) (94d348ce4)
- import from UXP: Bug 2023478 - improve handling of escape sequences in pk11uri_ParseAttributes. (7ae6442d) (f277da265)
- import from UXP: Bug 2033848 - Use non-default response ID for GTK file picker accept button. r=stransky (81babad1) (1f1e28073)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Zero-initialize ThreadSharedFloatArrayBufferList. (5ab14e59) (91d2413a4)
- import from UXP: No issue - Use ImmGCPtr for module meta data visits. (0bdcc65c) (456bea8af)
- import from UXP: [parser] Better align with spec definition of adding nodes. (a50e1d7a) (1f0c79b3a)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Avoid over-optimizing some getter/function calls. (a83b6f74) (94850d8a2)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Check more offsets during CFF subsetting. (9a457cbf) (acffb7115)
- import from UXP: [network] Make HttpBaseChannel::mLoadFlags atomic. (100f6aaf) (962fb7e60)]]>
* Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260620-962fb7e60-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260620-962fb7e60-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- ported from UXP: Issue #2306 - Re-introduce pref for WeakRef API spec. (8eac1db6) (938e5c744)
- import from UXP: Issue #2306 - Enable full weakref by default in platform. (0bd0d0a2) (74824f24b)
- import from UXP: Issue #3122 - Exclude local resources from <base> CSP checks. (692606e8) (6fc95b735)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2029066 - Remove Sinking of Live instructions. (27129430) (e89f0a52f)
- import from UXP: Bug 2029765 - avoid refcount over-release in nssTokenObjectCache error path [@ nssToken_Destroy]. (13d87376) (73b5f11e4)
- import from UXP: [network] Make keep-alive pref Atomic. (f20e0799) (0d6196afd)
- ported from UXP: [DOM] Reject too large mLength in MutableBlobStorage::WriteRunnable. (b60661df) (94d348ce4)
- import from UXP: Bug 2023478 - improve handling of escape sequences in pk11uri_ParseAttributes. (7ae6442d) (f277da265)
- import from UXP: Bug 2033848 - Use non-default response ID for GTK file picker accept button. r=stransky (81babad1) (1f1e28073)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Zero-initialize ThreadSharedFloatArrayBufferList. (5ab14e59) (91d2413a4)
- import from UXP: No issue - Use ImmGCPtr for module meta data visits. (0bdcc65c) (456bea8af)
- import from UXP: [parser] Better align with spec definition of adding nodes. (a50e1d7a) (1f0c79b3a)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Avoid over-optimizing some getter/function calls. (a83b6f74) (94850d8a2)
- import from UXP: [gfx] Check more offsets during CFF subsetting. (9a457cbf) (acffb7115)
- import from UXP: [network] Make HttpBaseChannel::mLoadFlags atomic. (100f6aaf) (962fb7e60)]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-26T22:38:23+00:00 2026-06-26T22:38:23+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9178#p9178
Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Fresh import of libpng 1.6.58 (b61274cd5d)
- Apply (hopefully for the last time before 2.0.x) APNG support code. (882bf4b345)
- [devtools] Consistently show filepicker on first save action from StyleEditor. (6316f240c7)
- Bug 2029403 - avoid PORT_Strdup in ssl_DecodeResumptionToken. (c95367158a)
- Bug 2030366 - avoid race with module unloading in NSSTrustDomain_FindTokensByURI. (43317d3eba)
- Bug 2030564 - add defensive input validation to sftk_compute_ANSI_X9_63_kdf. (346619a8ea)
- [DOM] Clean up WebGL transform feedback validation. (a4a23b4318)
- Issue #3122 - Put base paths in the json viewer client deps. (09108384c7)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom

IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20260627-3219d2d-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-ia32.7z

source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

NM28XP build:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-ia32.7z
Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod-sse.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20260627-d849524bd-uxp-98f21468a1-w7plus-avx2.7z

Official UXP changes picked since my last build:
- Fresh import of libpng 1.6.58 (b61274cd5d)
- Apply (hopefully for the last time before 2.0.x) APNG support code. (882bf4b345)
- [devtools] Consistently show filepicker on first save action from StyleEditor. (6316f240c7)
- Bug 2029403 - avoid PORT_Strdup in ssl_DecodeResumptionToken. (c95367158a)
- Bug 2030366 - avoid race with module unloading in NSSTrustDomain_FindTokensByURI. (43317d3eba)
- Bug 2030564 - add defensive input validation to sftk_compute_ANSI_X9_63_kdf. (346619a8ea)
- [DOM] Clean up WebGL transform feedback validation. (a4a23b4318)
- Issue #3122 - Put base paths in the json viewer client deps. (09108384c7)

No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build.

No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build.

Update Notice:
- You may delete file named icudt*.dat and icu63.dll inside program folder when updating from old releases.

* Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-26T22:38:35+00:00 2026-06-26T22:38:35+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9179#p9179
Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260627-40a79c75-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260627-40a79c75-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260627-id-656ea98-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260627-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>

Test binary:
MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20260627-40a79c75-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20260627-40a79c75-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom

* Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15.

--

New build of HBL-UXP for XP!

Test binary:
IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20260627-id-656ea98-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z
IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20260627-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-98f21468a1-xpmod.7z

source repo (excluding UXP):
https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild
https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild]]>
<![CDATA[RT1 Browser Platform :: Browsers release notes :: Reply by roytam1]]> 2026-06-26T22:38:41+00:00 2026-06-26T22:38:41+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35&p=9180#p9180 * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260627-b6372f6d3-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260627-b6372f6d3-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- import from UXP:
- Fresh import of libpng 1.6.58 (b61274cd)
- Apply (hopefully for the last time before 2.0.x) APNG support code. (882bf4b3) (dba06fd4e)
- ported from UXP: [devtools] Consistently show filepicker on first save action from StyleEditor. (6316f240) (c5177c2c5)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2029403 - avoid PORT_Strdup in ssl_DecodeResumptionToken. (c9536715) (999cc9dfb)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2030366 - avoid race with module unloading in NSSTrustDomain_FindTokensByURI. (43317d3e) (43c5cf5af)
- import from UXP: Bug 2030564 - add defensive input validation to sftk_compute_ANSI_X9_63_kdf. (346619a8e) (045e9f53a)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Clean up WebGL transform feedback validation. (a4a23b43) (6597dd785)
- import from UXP: Issue #3122 - Put base paths in the json viewer client deps. (09108384) (b6372f6d3)]]>
* Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual.
** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions.

Test binary:
Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20260627-b6372f6d3-xpmod.7z
Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20260627-b6372f6d3-xpmod.7z

repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55

Repo changes:
- import from UXP:
- Fresh import of libpng 1.6.58 (b61274cd)
- Apply (hopefully for the last time before 2.0.x) APNG support code. (882bf4b3) (dba06fd4e)
- ported from UXP: [devtools] Consistently show filepicker on first save action from StyleEditor. (6316f240) (c5177c2c5)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2029403 - avoid PORT_Strdup in ssl_DecodeResumptionToken. (c9536715) (999cc9dfb)
- ported from UXP: Bug 2030366 - avoid race with module unloading in NSSTrustDomain_FindTokensByURI. (43317d3e) (43c5cf5af)
- import from UXP: Bug 2030564 - add defensive input validation to sftk_compute_ANSI_X9_63_kdf. (346619a8e) (045e9f53a)
- import from UXP: [DOM] Clean up WebGL transform feedback validation. (a4a23b43) (6597dd785)
- import from UXP: Issue #3122 - Put base paths in the json viewer client deps. (09108384) (b6372f6d3)]]>
<![CDATA[Mypal Browser :: New Mypal68 :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-29T10:53:17+00:00 2026-06-29T10:53:17+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=658&p=9197#p9197
https://codeberg.org/Theodor2/Mypal68/releases/tag/78.0.3]]>

https://codeberg.org/Theodor2/Mypal68/releases/tag/78.0.3]]>
<![CDATA[Community ISOs :: Windows 8.1 Lite (Windows 8.1 ISO smaller than 1GB) :: Reply by ibay770]]> 2026-06-13T00:53:21+00:00 2026-06-13T00:53:21+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=811&p=9153#p9153 <![CDATA[Community Projects :: Dactyloidae Browser :: Reply by wuggy]]> 2026-06-29T17:01:17+00:00 2026-06-29T17:01:17+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=956&p=9198#p9198 <![CDATA[General Chat :: eBoard2 is (unofficially) back! :: Reply by wuggy]]> 2026-06-13T11:43:17+00:00 2026-06-13T11:43:17+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=980&p=9154#p9154
Will be back up ~4pm BST today]]>

Will be back up ~4pm BST today]]>
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Memes on Eclipse! :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-06-19T19:12:52+00:00 2026-06-19T19:12:52+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=315&p=9161#p9161 ) amateurs:

Ronaldo2026.jpg

Attachments


Ronaldo2026.jpg (41 KiB)

]]>
) amateurs:

Ronaldo2026.jpg

Attachments


Ronaldo2026.jpg (41 KiB)

]]>
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Then dust yourself off and try again :: Reply by xperceniol_sal]]> 2026-07-08T16:03:57+00:00 2026-07-08T16:03:57+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=609&p=9207#p9207
I Just figured I'd pop in quickly seeing I've been away for a while recovering. I'm doing a little bit better I guess, but still struggling. I don't know.

God the forum is so dead now. What happened while I was away? I realize things happen when one is gone for a while and out of the loop.

I hope everyone is doing well and getting outside if possible. I've have been walking again (short trips for now) but good to get natural vitamin D again. My blood work all came back normal so that is good and my chest X-Ray also was normal.

We hit the 90's a few time already on the east coast but this week is in the 80's and it should be a dry heat so walking is not torture.

I didn't forget about this place, though, and the people here that helped me.

All the best:

Sal]]>

I Just figured I'd pop in quickly seeing I've been away for a while recovering. I'm doing a little bit better I guess, but still struggling. I don't know.

God the forum is so dead now. What happened while I was away? I realize things happen when one is gone for a while and out of the loop.

I hope everyone is doing well and getting outside if possible. I've have been walking again (short trips for now) but good to get natural vitamin D again. My blood work all came back normal so that is good and my chest X-Ray also was normal.

We hit the 90's a few time already on the east coast but this week is in the 80's and it should be a dry heat so walking is not torture.

I didn't forget about this place, though, and the people here that helped me.

All the best:

Sal]]>
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Then dust yourself off and try again :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> 2026-07-08T19:45:30+00:00 2026-07-08T19:45:30+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=609&p=9208#p9208
I just visited Atlanta for FIFA World Cup and MLB Braves.
Rented an "electric scooter". Was a BLAST and a TON of FUN.
But holy cow! We weren't expecting them to cost so much just to RENT.
Was so much FUN that I have one on order through Amazon.
Under $200 USD after applying for their card.]]>

I just visited Atlanta for FIFA World Cup and MLB Braves.
Rented an "electric scooter". Was a BLAST and a TON of FUN.
But holy cow! We weren't expecting them to cost so much just to RENT.
Was so much FUN that I have one on order through Amazon.
Under $200 USD after applying for their card.]]>
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Then dust yourself off and try again :: Reply by Duke]]> 2026-07-08T23:28:51+00:00 2026-07-08T23:28:51+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=609&p=9209#p9209
The-10-Pen wrote: 08 Jul 2026, 19:45 We weren't expecting them to cost so much just to RENT.
I guess you can blame the world cup ;)]]>
The-10-Pen wrote: 08 Jul 2026, 19:45 We weren't expecting them to cost so much just to RENT.
I guess you can blame the world cup ;)]]>
<![CDATA[General Chat :: Then dust yourself off and try again :: Reply by The-10-Pen]]> 2026-07-09T00:59:39+00:00 2026-07-09T00:59:39+00:00 https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=609&p=9210#p9210
Duke wrote: 08 Jul 2026, 23:28 I guess you can blame the world cup ;)
Not only for high scooter rent, but also for an outright onslaught of HOMELESS PANHANDLERS.

You think you are asking a "friendly passerby" for directions, to just around the corner, a two block walk, he leads you the entire way, only to give his SOB STORY and ASK FOR MONEY.

Even had a HOMELESS LADY throw a plastic bag of GLASS at our feet and try to accuse us of breaking her things and wanting us to PAY HER for what SHE THREW AT US.

One HOMELESS GUY showed us that those scooters have "free time" on them if the previous renter doesn't "end ride" via the app and wants us to PAY HIM for that free information.

Holy Crap !!! I've never seen as many HOMELESS PANHANDLERS all conjugating within a couple square city blocks.

Not sure if I will ever visit ATLANTA ever again, it was THAT bad !!!]]>
Duke wrote: 08 Jul 2026, 23:28 I guess you can blame the world cup ;)
Not only for high scooter rent, but also for an outright onslaught of HOMELESS PANHANDLERS.

You think you are asking a "friendly passerby" for directions, to just around the corner, a two block walk, he leads you the entire way, only to give his SOB STORY and ASK FOR MONEY.

Even had a HOMELESS LADY throw a plastic bag of GLASS at our feet and try to accuse us of breaking her things and wanting us to PAY HER for what SHE THREW AT US.

One HOMELESS GUY showed us that those scooters have "free time" on them if the previous renter doesn't "end ride" via the app and wants us to PAY HIM for that free information.

Holy Crap !!! I've never seen as many HOMELESS PANHANDLERS all conjugating within a couple square city blocks.

Not sure if I will ever visit ATLANTA ever again, it was THAT bad !!!]]>