(Some?) Muslim women have their faces covered too. I've seen them right across the road where I live in the past.
Also seen AT MY PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT.
However:
NOT RELEVANT... I'll even label this "so-called comparison" as "intentionally misleading the public"...
We all know the difference between a "hoodlum" hiding his face so that he can do ILLEGAL ACTIVITY versus *ANY* comparison you throw at me!
HOODLUMS wear "masks" so that they can LOOT, so that they can RIOT, so that they can KIDNAP GRANDMA and seek ransom in bitcoin!
We've all seen the news. We all know these MASKED HOODLUMS! I'm *ALL FOR* a system of justice that NO LONGER refers to them as "suspects" if they are not only caught on camera but DOZENS OF WITNESSES (ie, ARREST ON SITE, THROW IN THE SLAMMER). It is the mere existence of those CAMERAS being the very REASON that these HOODLUMS wear that MASK.
They are not wearing that mask for "health and safety".
They are not wearing that mask as part of a religious "act of faith".
WE ALL KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. This isn't "rocket science".
Kind of akin to International Humanitarian Law (Geneva Conventions III and IV and Hague Regulations) that require military to wear uniforms.
Is it "profiling"? Yeah, to an extent. But again, military wear uniforms FOR A REASON. HOODLUMS wear masks FOR A REASON. Profile away, I'm okay with that! But there is a difference between "profiling" a HOODLUM (with SEVERAL run-in's with THE LAW and ON PROBATION from those run-in's [put an ankle bracelet on the POS and arrest-on-site if hiding his face from public cameras!]) versus "profiling" a LEGIT RELIGIOUS RITE (with ZERO run-in's with THE LAW and to be HIGHLY RESPECTED in this "godless age")!
Again, "it's not rocket science".