Windows XP vs Vista vs 7 vs 8.1 vs 10 vs 11 Speed Test. A speed test of every generation of Windows, the six major Microsoft operating systems since 2001.
And the loser is:
https://www.techspot.com/news/110817-windows-11-performs-worse-than-older-windows-versions.html
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VZJO-hOT4c
Due to server slowness, downtime, and other issues, Eclipse will be moving to a more stable and efficient platform that should result in much better stability. There is no timeline for this yet, just want you to know what's happening with all the downtime and I have a plan to fix it.
Windows versions speed test
-
The-10-Pen
- Posts: 542
- Joined: 16 Feb 2025, 08:43
- OS: Win10 2016 LTSB
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 93 times

Windows versions speed test
Cool!
"Default config" setups have always been TERRIBLE.
I once had a tweaked-out XP host that would launch a tweaked-out Win10 VM at startup.
The host-tweaked-XP *PLUS* the guest-tweaked-10 VM would load, on same exact hardware, FASTER than "default config" 10 would load by itself.
There are some INTENTIONAL startup delays built into default-config 10 (actually in everything higher than and including 8).
I have to assume the delay was designed-in for a "reason". We call things like that a "race condition" at work.
Shave roughly 5 to 10 seconds on your startup just by this alone.
https://www.eightforums.com/threads/startup-delay-time-reduce-in-windows-8.37373/
"Default config" setups have always been TERRIBLE.
I once had a tweaked-out XP host that would launch a tweaked-out Win10 VM at startup.
The host-tweaked-XP *PLUS* the guest-tweaked-10 VM would load, on same exact hardware, FASTER than "default config" 10 would load by itself.
There are some INTENTIONAL startup delays built into default-config 10 (actually in everything higher than and including 8).
I have to assume the delay was designed-in for a "reason". We call things like that a "race condition" at work.
Shave roughly 5 to 10 seconds on your startup just by this alone.
https://www.eightforums.com/threads/startup-delay-time-reduce-in-windows-8.37373/
- Iffy-chan
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 11 Apr 2026, 13:06
- Location: England
- Mood: lol, this box is copied from XMB
- OS: Windows XP x64
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:

Windows versions speed test
Is there not a text rundown of the results? I'm not opening YouTube for this.
- Duke
- Full Moderator
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 16 Mar 2024, 13:32
- OS: Windows 8.1 x64
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Windows versions speed test
Because of Youtube being Google ? Then use Invidious:
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=7VZJO-hOT4c
-
The-10-Pen
- Posts: 542
- Joined: 16 Feb 2025, 08:43
- OS: Win10 2016 LTSB
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 93 times

Windows versions speed test
Possible, some folks are like that ("to each their own").
But I suspect it's because the user is on XP or 7 and is limited to POS browser speeds "on a good day", let alone on a heavy site like YouTube.
(edit: his profile says he runs XP x64 - so he really is limited to POS browser speeds, but I don't think he has ever revealed his browser)
- Duke
- Full Moderator
- Posts: 643
- Joined: 16 Mar 2024, 13:32
- OS: Windows 8.1 x64
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
Windows versions speed test
That's why it's a good idea to use one of the Invidious mirrors, they call them "instances":
https://docs.invidious.io/instances/
Invidious delivers Youtube videos without the Google crap:
https://invidious.io
-
The-10-Pen
- Posts: 542
- Joined: 16 Feb 2025, 08:43
- OS: Win10 2016 LTSB
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 93 times

Windows versions speed test
I'm aware of what Invidious is.
Most of the time, and the very ***FEW*** times that I have to YouTube, I JUST USE THE YOUTUBE SITE but with a **TON** of userstyles and userscripts.
I all but re-write the entire d@mn web site "to my liking".
I do use the below. Just tap the Escape key when a YouTube video is playing and it redirects to an Invidious instance.
More often than not though, the video just plays ***BETTER*** just sticking with REAL YOUTUBE (plus userstyles and userscripts).
Most of the time, and the very ***FEW*** times that I have to YouTube, I JUST USE THE YOUTUBE SITE but with a **TON** of userstyles and userscripts.
I all but re-write the entire d@mn web site "to my liking".
I do use the below. Just tap the Escape key when a YouTube video is playing and it redirects to an Invidious instance.
More often than not though, the video just plays ***BETTER*** just sticking with REAL YOUTUBE (plus userstyles and userscripts).
Code: Select all
// ==UserScript==
// @name - YouTube 00 - Invidious Redirect
// @version 1.2.1
// @include http://www.youtube.com/*
// @include https://www.youtube.com/*
// @run-at document-start
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(event) {
if (event.key === 'Escape') {
var a = 0;
setInterval(function () {
if (a === 0 && window.location.href.indexOf('watch?') > -1 && window.location.href.indexOf('list=WL') < 0) {
a = '//inv.nadeko.net/watch?' + window.parent.location.href.split('?')[1] + '&quality=dash&quality_dash=best';
window.location.replace(a);
}
}, 10);
}
});
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests