Page 1 of 1
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 28 Feb 2026, 19:20
by OwnedByWuigi
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 28 Feb 2026, 19:21
by OwnedByWuigi
This also forks Lun3r (a fork of the RT1 Serpent release), so what is in there is also in here.
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 28 Feb 2026, 19:22
by OwnedByWuigi
KNOWN ISSUES:
YouTube Desktop bitches about "a new browser", YT Mobile works fine however.
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 01 Mar 2026, 17:16
by OwnedByWuigi
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 06 Mar 2026, 16:33
by OwnedByWuigi
new release soon, (some) upstream firefox extensions now work!
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 15 Mar 2026, 23:35
by OwnedByWuigi
Working on a SSE only release, for i686+, aswell as experimental Win2k support.
Abandoning GitHub too, new commits will be at
https://repo.dactyloidae.xyz/dactyloidae/uxp
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 29 Mar 2026, 12:14
by OwnedByWuigi
OFFICIALLY THE FASTEST XUL BROWSER
DACTYLOIDAE 13 "WARP" OUT NOW
https://repo.dactyloidae.xyz/Dactyloidae/UXP/releases/tag/13.0
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 29 Mar 2026, 17:01
by The-10-Pen
OwnedByWuigi wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 12:14
OFFICIALLY THE FASTEST XUL BROWSER
Please post a screencap or two that backs up this. Thanks.
ie, I **AA BB AA NN DD OO NN EE DD** XUL a year or two ago because of how DAMN SLOW they are/were.
I kinda have no plans to even try another XUL without some sort of "reason" and speed would be a reason.
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 29 Mar 2026, 22:03
by The-10-Pen

- 2026-03-29_18-02-00.jpg (178 KiB) Viewed 1261 times
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 29 Mar 2026, 22:50
by OwnedByWuigi
The-10-Pen wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 17:01
OwnedByWuigi wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 12:14
OFFICIALLY THE FASTEST XUL BROWSER
Please post a screencap or two that backs up this. Thanks.
I kinda have no plans to even try another XUL without some sort of "reason" and speed would be a reason.
SPEEDOMETER 2.1
Pale Moon 34.1.0 AVX2 - 22.3
Dactyloidae 13.0-pre1.1 SSE2 - 33.7
This is also the first XUL browser to get e10s stable and enabled *by default*, which is also another major pain point, so now one page freezes instead of the whole browser.
YT Polymer loads 3x faster, crashes are less common, etc. Most of these changes will be backported to Eclipse Hydra/Lun3r first, then upstream UXP.
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 08:53
by The-10-Pen
OwnedByWuigi wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 22:50
SPEEDOMETER 2.1
Pale Moon 34.1.0 AVX2 - 22.3
Dactyloidae 13.0-pre1.1 SSE2 - 33.7
Thanks !!!
Can you also please share the CPU and RAM of the test PC?
And were these tests performed on true hardware? Or a VM?
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 10:01
by OwnedByWuigi
The-10-Pen wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026, 08:53
OwnedByWuigi wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 22:50
SPEEDOMETER 2.1
Pale Moon 34.1.0 AVX2 - 22.3
Dactyloidae 13.0-pre1.1 SSE2 - 33.7
Thanks !!!
Can you also please share the CPU and RAM of the test PC?
And were these tests performed on true hardware? Or a VM?
ThinkPad T480 - 32GB DDR4, i5 8350U
Real hardware.
Another user tested it on a AMD Athlon 64 X2 (?) and got similar results
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 10:28
by The-10-Pen
I'm afraid that isn't going to be "fast enough" for my usage.
My real hardware is slower and older but scores more than twice as fast on a "competing browser".
The redacted tab is just to hide my email address being shown on that tab.
Slower by 18% or 48% depending on how you count it.
On an e10s browser, it's that 48% that's technically more important, not the "single thread rating" of 18%.

- 2026-03-30_6-08-43.jpg (135.19 KiB) Viewed 1139 times

- IMG_20260330_062322.jpg (74.16 KiB) Viewed 1138 times
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 10:37
by The-10-Pen
ps - that is not to undermine the endeavor, looks like GREAT WORK and FINALLY somebody coming along that seeks to improve true PERFORMANCE !!!
Just saying that *I* don't gain anything from it on *my* hardware and *my* OS.
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 10:40
by OwnedByWuigi
The-10-Pen wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026, 10:28
I'm afraid that isn't going to be "fast enough" for my usage.
Slower by 18% or 48% depending on how you count it.
On an e10s browser, it's that 48% that's technically more important, not the "single thread rating" of 18%.
2026-03-30_6-08-43.jpg
IMG_20260330_062322.jpg
I'm doing more work to optimise the browser engine even further, I think the only pain points in Speedometer for me is jQuery and React
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 10:54
by The-10-Pen
Keep up the great work!
ps - my Speedometer 2.1 score of 71.0 is *WITH* several extensions also loaded.
My "baseline" (just the browser and some flags/settings changes, no extensions) is close to FOUR-AND-A-HALF times faster.
On a laptop that is older and slower than your test machine. And also 8GB RAM to your 32GB RAM.
Again, GREAT WORK and somebody finally came along to improve PERFORMANCE.
Just that I, as the end user, really has to use what is best for me and my OS.
I was still on XP just a year or two ago.
There comes a point in time where the end user has to ADMIT that they (myself included !!!) is lying to themselves when they (myself included !!!) shout from rooftops on how much "better" (have to include "air quotes") their (myself included !!!) "legacy OS" 'is'. Not to be misread. 10 and 11 *sucks*. But they **CAN** be modified into truly awesome (but don't hold your breath expecting Microsoft to do that for you, lol).
Baseline without any extensions:

- IMG_20260330_064558.jpg (129.47 KiB) Viewed 1124 times
Dactyloidae Browser (yet another UXP, what a surprise)
Posted: 30 Mar 2026, 11:10
by The-10-Pen
OwnedByWuigi wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026, 10:40
I'm doing more work to optimise the browser engine even further, I think the only pain points in Speedometer for me is jQuery and React
I can obtain Speedometer 2.1 scores on my older and slower laptop.
But at this stage, I think I'll delay until further optimizations are in place.
If I remember correctly, the "other" UXP browsers that I ran on this older-and-slower only scored in the SINGLE DIGITS.
But I'm not 100% sure on that from memory. That could be the
even older and
even slower computer used out in the garage.