Due to server slowness, downtime, and other issues, Eclipse will be moving to a more stable and efficient platform that should result in much better stability. There is no timeline for this yet, just want you to know what's happening with all the downtime and I have a plan to fix it.
Speaking solely for myself, I don't want the .iso, I would rather have the "guide" and "config files" and list of programs used to CREATE the .iso.
I only use Win11 21H2 from inside a VM and processes/threads/handles shows I gain nothing in swapping to your release.
BUT that doesn't mean I wouldn't LEARN SOMETHING from your config files and list of programs that the .iso simply doesn't teach me.
2026-01-08_15-07-32.png (72.32 KiB) Viewed 5768 times
And, no offense, but I *hate* StartIsBack/StartAllBack and how it always seems to land in "lite" OS's.
To each their own, of course. I just achieve LIGHTER "lite" *without* Start Is|All Back.
Thanks so much for your "Windows 11 21h2 lite build 22000.3260" upload & I personally love StartISBack & StartAllBack, but hate Open Shell. Regardless though ...I have access to (plus the newest other Windows Lite version builds) another custom build Windows 11 21h2 Lite 22000.3260 release that has had all the Bloatware, Telemetry, Windows Defender & misc. other removed that is only approx. 1.4 gig. It's stable, more secure & runs fantastic without any errors.
I used to make my own ...but said custom Lite Windows OS releases are so much better than mine, I don't even bother trying anymore.
The included Firefox is not in English on this release.
If you want "lite" and don't want to do the work yourself, there are MUCH LITER versions.
Windows X-Lite does a really great job - https://windowsxlite.com/
re: StartIsBack/StartAllBack/OpenShell/Firefox - none of them should be included, in my opinion.
Just release a Windows that is ALL WINDOWS, just remove the d@mn bloat, don't ADD *ANYTHING*.
Personally, I think if we all put our heads together and SHARE our METHODS, we can do an equal or better job than Windows X-Lite.
Placing blind trust in an .iso with zero knowledge of who/how it was created, you might as well download it from a known malware site and infect your computer with every trojan known to exist.
We are called Eclipse **COMMUNITY**... ie, let's WORK TOGETHER and create our own "community build" and PUBLICLY SHARE "how" we created it!
To me, that at least creates something that can be **TRUSTED**.
ie, why "trust" an ENGLISH .iso when the included FIREFOX is **NOT** in English ??? ??? ???
Me personally, the second I launched Firefox and saw it NOT in ENGLISH, the very first thought in my mind was: UH OH, WHAT HACKER DID I JUST GIVE MY IP ADDRESS TO?
HJY-2Best wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026, 05:28Thanks so much for your "Windows 11 21h2 lite build 22000.3260" upload & I personally love StartISBack & StartAllBack, but hate Open Shell. Regardless though ...I have access to (plus the newest other Windows Lite version builds) another custom build Windows 11 21h2 Lite 22000.3260 release that has had all the Bloatware, Telemetry, Windows Defender & misc. other removed that is only approx. 1.4 gig. It's stable, more secure & runs fantastic without any errors.
I used to make my own ...but said custom Lite Windows OS releases are so much better than mine, I don't even bother trying anymore.
You said "another" and underlined it.
I have to assume you are *NOT* talking about the .iso being discussed here.
Can you share WHERE your "another" was obtained from ???
Because it can NOT be this one. For one, you site 1.4 gig.
Clearly *NOT* the .iso being discussed here.
2026-01-12_6-24-55.png (111.26 KiB) Viewed 5503 times
The-10-Pen wrote: ↑12 Jan 2026, 10:56
Me personally, the second I launched Firefox and saw it NOT in ENGLISH, the very first thought in my mind was: UH OH, WHAT HACKER DID I JUST GIVE MY IP ADDRESS TO?
I had it made for me, I'm from Brazil and when assembling it I took advantage of what I already had with English and I just changed the Windows language to standard English and Firefox ended up in PT-BR